Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: A systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis Journal Article


Authors: Medeiros, L. R.; Duarte, C. S.; Rosa, D. D.; Edelweiss, M. I.; Edelweiss, M.; Silva, F. R.; Winnnikow, E. P.; Pires, P. D. S.; Rosa, M. I.
Article Title: Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: A systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis
Abstract: Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance (MR) is a promising emerging technique for evaluating breast lesions. A quantitative systematic review was performed to estimate the accuracy of breast MR in the diagnosis of high-risk breast lesions and breast cancer. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, MED-LINE, CANCERLIT, LILACS, and EMBASE databases was performed from January 1985 to August 2010. The medical subjects heading (MeSH) and text words for the terms "breast neoplasm", "breast lesions", "breast cancer" and "magnetic resonance" were combined with the MeSH term diagnosis ("sensitivity and specificity"). Studies that compared breast MR with paraffin-embedded sections parameters for the diagnosis of breast lesions (benign, high-risk borderline, and breast cancer) were included. Sixty-nine studies were analyzed, which included 9,298 women with 9,884 breast lesions. Interrater overall agreement between breast MR and paraffin section diagnosis was 79% (K = 0.55), indicating moderate agreement. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% [95% CI 88-92%] and 75% [95% CI 70-79%], respectively. The pooled likelihood positive ratio was 3.64 (95% CI 3.0-4.2) and the negative ratio was 0.12 (95% CI 0.09-0.15). For breast cancer or high-risk lesions versus benign lesions, the AUC was 0.91 for breast MR and the point Q* was 0.84. In summary, breast MR is a useful pre-operative test for predicting the diagnosis of breast lesions. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Keywords: review; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; breast cancer; false negative result; systematic review; contrast enhancement; diagnosis; false positive result; non invasive measurement; meta analysis; mri; breast lesion; receiver operating characteristic; meta-analysis; specificity; sensitivity; breast magnetic resonance; magnetic resonance mammography; roc
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 126
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2011-04-01
Start Page: 273
End Page: 285
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1326-9
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 21221772
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 17 August 2011" - "CODEN: BCTRD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marcia Edelweiss
    104 Edelweiss