Use of touch imprint cytology as a simple method to enrich tumor cells for molecular analysis Journal Article


Authors: Dogan, S.; Becker, J. C.; Rekhtman, N.; Tang, L. H.; Nafa, K.; Ladanyi, M.; Klimstra, D. S.
Article Title: Use of touch imprint cytology as a simple method to enrich tumor cells for molecular analysis
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A relative excess of nonneoplastic cells in frozen carcinoma samples is often a cause of false-negative results in molecular assays. Given the greater cohesiveness of epithelial tumor cells compared with nonneoplastic epithelium and mesenchymal stroma, the authors hypothesized that tumor procurement by touch imprinting would provide a simple, cost-effective method of obtaining enriched neoplastic cells compared with frozen whole-tumor samples. METHODS: Eleven adenocarcinomas with known KRAS gene mutations were tested. Two sets of 8 touch imprint (TP) slides and 1 frozen whole-tumor sample (FS), both with a corresponding hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide, were obtained from each tumor. DNA from unstained TP and FS samples was tested for KRAS exon 2 mutations by Sanger sequencing. The percentage of carcinoma cells was determined by light microscopy of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. The fold increase in the mutant-enriched DNA in TP versus FS samples was determined by calculating the height ratio between the mutant and wild-type peaks on the sequencing electropherogram. RESULTS: Using light microscopy, TP demonstrated a 1.1-fold to 3.5-fold (mean, 1.8-fold) enrichment in neoplastic cells compared with the FS. The mutant-to-wild-type peak height ratio was 1.4-fold to 7.1-fold (mean, 3.1-fold) higher in TP compared with the corresponding FS samples. The average amount of extracted DNA ranged from 145 ng to 7.9 lg per TP slide. CONCLUSIONS: The procurement of carcinoma samples by TP is rapid, simple, and inexpensive; consistently provides a tumor-enriched sample; is an excellent source of high-quality tumor DNA; and could compensate for the relatively low sensitivity of direct sequencing. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013;121:354-60. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: oncoprotein; genetics; mutation; proto-oncogene proteins; liver neoplasms; comparative study; methodology; adenocarcinoma; metastasis; lung neoplasms; carcinoma, pancreatic ductal; pathology; pancreas carcinoma; colorectal neoplasms; lung tumor; utilization review; dna; colorectal tumor; nucleotide sequence; liver tumor; dna, neoplasm; molecular analysis; ras protein; dna mutational analysis; ras proteins; kras protein, human; cytodiagnosis; tumor procurement; tumor enrichment; touch imprint cytology; sanger sequencing
Journal Title: Cancer Cytopathology
Volume: 121
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1934-662X
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons  
Date Published: 2013-07-01
Start Page: 354
End Page: 360
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21292
PUBMED: 23576371
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 1 November 2013" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Natasha Rekhtman
    434 Rekhtman
  2. Khedoudja Nafa
    244 Nafa
  3. David S Klimstra
    978 Klimstra
  4. Marc Ladanyi
    1332 Ladanyi
  5. Snjezana Dogan
    190 Dogan
  6. Laura Hong Tang
    448 Tang
  7. Jillian Claire Becker
    3 Becker