Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy for locally advanced gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Vos, E. L.; Carr, R. A.; Hsu, M.; Nakauchi, M.; Nobel, T.; Russo, A.; Barbetta, A.; Tan, K. S.; Tang, L.; Ilson, D.; Ku, G. Y.; Wu, A. J.; Janjigian, Y. Y.; Yoon, S. S.; Bains, M. S.; Jones, D. R.; Coit, D.; Molena, D.; Strong, V. E.
Article Title: Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy for locally advanced gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma
Abstract: Background: Trials typically group cancers of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) with oesophageal or gastric cancer when studying neoadjuvant chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy, so the results may not be fully applicable to GOJ cancer. Because optimal neoadjuvant treatment for GOJ cancer remains controversial, outcomes with neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy for locally advanced GOJ adenocarcinoma were compared retrospectively. Methods: Data were collected from all patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery for adenocarcinoma located at the GOJ at a single high-volume institution between 2002 and 2017. Postoperative major complications and mortality were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by log rank test and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate recurrence, and groups were compared using Gray's test. Results: Of 775 patients, 650 had neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 125 had chemotherapy. These groups were comparable in terms of clinical tumour and lymph node categories, although the chemoradiation group had greater proportions of white men, complete pathological response to chemotherapy, and smaller proportions of diffuse cancer, poor differentiation, and neurovascular invasion. Postoperative major complications (20.0 versus 17.6 per cent) and 30-day mortality (1.7 versus 1.6 per cent) were not significantly different between the chemoradiation and chemotherapy groups. After adjustment, type of therapy (chemoradiation versus chemotherapy) was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95 per cent c.i. 0.96 to 1.67) or DFS (HR 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Type of recurrence (local, regional, or distant) did not differ after neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy. Conclusion: In patients undergoing surgical resection for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the GOJ, OS and DFS did not differ significantly between patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiation compared with chemotherapy.
Keywords: surgery; perioperative chemotherapy; therapy; chemoradiotherapy; esophageal; preoperative chemoradiation; cancer
Journal Title: British Journal of Surgery
Volume: 108
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0007-1323
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2021-11-01
Start Page: 1332
End Page: 1340
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000728149000033
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab228
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC8599637
PUBMED: 34476473
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sam Yoon
    108 Yoon
  2. Meier Hsu
    169 Hsu
  3. Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
    231 Ku
  4. Yelena Yuriy Janjigian
    395 Janjigian
  5. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    401 Wu
  6. Laura Hong Tang
    447 Tang
  7. Vivian Strong
    265 Strong
  8. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  9. David H Ilson
    433 Ilson
  10. Manjit S Bains
    338 Bains
  11. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones
  12. Daniela   Molena
    272 Molena
  13. Kay See   Tan
    241 Tan
  14. Rebecca Ann Carr
    22 Carr
  15. Elvira Lise Vos
    26 Vos