Authors: | Krdzalic, J.; Maas, M.; Gollub, M. J.; Beets-Tan, R. G. H. |
Review Title: | Guidelines for MR imaging in rectal cancer: Europe versus United States |
Abstract: | The aim of this study was to compare and contrast recently published guidelines for staging and reporting of MR imaging in rectal cancer from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the North American Society of Abdominal Radiology. These guidelines were assessed on the presence of consensus and disagreement. Items were compared by two reviewers, and items with agreement and disagreement between the guidelines were identified and are presented in the current paper. Differences between guidelines are discussed to offer insights in practice variations between both continents and among expert centers, which to some extent may explain the differences between guidelines. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
Keywords: | united states; comparative study; neoadjuvant therapy; cancer staging; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; staging; diagnostic accuracy; consensus; practice guideline; information processing; europe; questionnaire; radiologist; contrast enhancement; rectum cancer; diffusion weighted imaging; mri; rectal cancer; anal canal; anus sphincter; guideline; human; priority journal; article; north american |
Journal Title: | Abdominal Radiology |
Volume: | 44 |
Issue: | 11 |
ISSN: | 2366-004X |
Publisher: | Springer |
Date Published: | 2019-11-01 |
Start Page: | 3498 |
End Page: | 3507 |
Language: | English |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-019-02251-5 |
PUBMED: | 31605186 |
PROVIDER: | scopus |
DOI/URL: | |
Notes: | Source: Scopus |