Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting Journal Article


Authors: Beets-Tan, R. G. H.; Lambregts, D. M. J.; Maas, M.; Bipat, S.; Barbaro, B.; Curvo-Semedo, L.; Fenlon, H. M.; Gollub, M. J.; Gourtsoyianni, S.; Halligan, S.; Hoeffel, C.; Kim, S. H.; Laghi, A.; Maier, A.; Rafaelsen, S. R.; Stoker, J.; Taylor, S. A.; Torkzad, M. R.; Blomqvist, L.
Article Title: Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting
Abstract: Objectives: To update the 2012 ESGAR consensus guidelines on the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinical staging and restaging of rectal cancer. Methods: Fourteen abdominal imaging experts from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) participated in a consensus meeting, organised according to an adaptation of the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Two independent (non-voting) Chairs facilitated the meeting. 246 items were scored (comprising 229 items from the previous 2012 consensus and 17 additional items) and classified as ‘appropriate’ or ‘inappropriate’ (defined by ≥ 80 % consensus) or uncertain (defined by OpenSPiltSPi 80 % consensus). Results: Consensus was reached for 226 (92 %) of items. From these recommendations regarding hardware, patient preparation, imaging sequences and acquisition, criteria for MR imaging evaluation and reporting structure were constructed. The main additions to the 2012 consensus include recommendations regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging, criteria for nodal staging and a recommended structured report template. Conclusions: These updated expert consensus recommendations should be used as clinical guidelines for primary staging and restaging of rectal cancer using MRI. Key Points: • These guidelines present recommendations for staging and reporting of rectal cancer. • The guidelines were constructed through consensus amongst 14 pelvic imaging experts. • Consensus was reached by the experts for 92 % of the 246 items discussed. • Practical guidelines for nodal staging are proposed. • A structured reporting template is presented. © 2017, The Author(s).
Keywords: cancer surgery; treatment planning; cancer patient; cancer staging; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; staging; tumor volume; practice guideline; surgical approach; structured reporting; organ preservation; rectum cancer; diffusion weighted imaging; clinical examination; standards; local excision; human; priority journal; article; cancer rectal neoplasms
Journal Title: European Radiology
Volume: 28
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0938-7994
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2018-04-01
Start Page: 1465
End Page: 1475
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5834554
PUBMED: 29043428
DOI/URL:
Notes: Corrigendum issued, see DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5204-2 -- Article -- Export Date: 2 April 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marc J Gollub
    208 Gollub