Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017 Journal Article


Authors: Gollub, M. J.; Arya, S.; Beets-Tan, R. G.; dePrisco, G.; Gonen, M.; Jhaveri, K.; Kassam, Z.; Kaur, H.; Kim, D.; Knezevic, A.; Korngold, E.; Lall, C.; Lalwani, N.; Blair Macdonald, D.; Moreno, C.; Nougaret, S.; Pickhardt, P.; Sheedy, S.; Harisinghani, M.
Article Title: Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017
Abstract: Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: rectal cancer; expert panel; consensus recommendations; rectal mri; white paper
Journal Title: Abdominal Radiology
Volume: 43
Issue: 11
ISSN: 2366-004X
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2018-11-01
Start Page: 2893
End Page: 2902
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9
PUBMED: 29785540
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 November 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marc J Gollub
    208 Gollub
  2. Mithat Gonen
    1028 Gonen
  3. Andrea Knezevic
    106 Knezevic