What's new in screening in 2015? Journal Article


Authors: Carlsson, S. V.; Roobol, M. J.
Article Title: What's new in screening in 2015?
Abstract: Purpose of review The aim of this review was to highlight important articles in the field of prostate cancer screening published during 2015 and early 2016. Four major areas were identified for the purpose: screening strategies, post-United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2011-2012, screening trends/patterns, and shared decision making. Recent findings Several studies furthered the evidence that screening reduces the risk of metastasis and death from prostate cancer. Multiplex screening strategies are of proven benefit; genetics and MRI need further evaluation. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates declined in men above age of 50 years, as did the overall prostate cancer incidence following the USPSTF 2011-2012 recommendation against PSA. The consequences of declining screening rates will become apparent in the next few years. More research is needed to identify the most optimal approach to engage in, and implement, an effective shared decision-making in clinical practice. Summary Data emerging in 2015 provided evidence on the question of how best to screen and brought more steps in the right direction of 'next-generation prostate cancer screening'. Screening is an ongoing process in all men regardless of whether or not they might benefit from early detection and treatment. After the USPSTF 2011-2012 recommendation, the rates of PSA testing are declining; however, this decline is observed in all men and not solely in those who will not benefit from the screening. The long-term effect of this recommendation might not be as anticipated. More studies are needed on how to implement the best available evidence on who, and when, to screen in clinical practice.
Keywords: mortality; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; screening; follow-up; decision-making; examination; population-based cohort; digital rectal; predictive accuracy; cancer; task-force recommendation; risk models improve; participants evaluation
Journal Title: Current Opinion in Urology
Volume: 26
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0963-0643
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2016-09-01
Start Page: 447
End Page: 458
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000380751100010
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000321
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 27326657
PMCID: PMC5082833
Notes: Review -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sigrid Viktoria Carlsson
    220 Carlsson