Do men receive information required for shared decision making about PSA testing? Results from a national survey Journal Article


Authors: Leyva, B.; Persoskie, A.; Ottenbacher, A.; Hamilton, J. G.; Allen, J. D.; Kobrin, S. C.; Taplin, S. H.
Article Title: Do men receive information required for shared decision making about PSA testing? Results from a national survey
Abstract: Most professional organizations, including the American College of Physicians and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, emphasize that screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test should only occur after a detailed discussion between the health-care provider and patient about the known risks and potential benefits of the test. In fact, guidelines strongly advise health-care providers to involve patients, particularly those at elevated risk of prostate cancer, in a “shared decision making” (SDM) process about PSA testing. We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey 2011–2012—a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey—to examine the extent to which health professionals provided men with information critical to SDM prior to PSA testing, including (1) that patients had a choice about whether or not to undergo PSA testing, (2) that not all doctors recommend PSA testing, and (3) that no one is sure if PSA testing saves lives. Over half (55 %) of men between the ages of 50 and 74 reported ever having had a PSA test. However, only 10 % of men, regardless of screening status, reported receiving all three pieces of information: 55 % reported being informed that they could choose whether or not to undergo testing, 22 % reported being informed that some doctors recommend PSA testing and others do not, and 14 % reported being informed that no one is sure if PSA testing actually saves lives. Black men and men with lower levels of education were less likely to be provided this information. There is a need to improve patient-provider communication about the uncertainties associated with the PSA test. Interventions directed at patients, providers, and practice settings should be considered. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA).
Keywords: shared decision making; uncertainty; prostate cancer screening; patient-provider communication; psa testing
Journal Title: Journal of Cancer Education
Volume: 31
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0885-8195
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2016-12-01
Start Page: 693
End Page: 701
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26498649
PMCID: PMC5515087
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 November 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jada Gabrielle Hamilton
    111 Hamilton