Financial toxicity and its association with prostate and colon cancer screening Journal Article


Authors: Herriges, M. J.; Shenhav-Goldberg, R.; Peck, J. I.; Bhanvadia, S. K.; Morgans, A.; Chino, F.; Chandrasekar, T.; Shapiro, O.; Jacob, J. M.; Basnet, A.; Bratslavsky, G.; Goldberg, H.
Article Title: Financial toxicity and its association with prostate and colon cancer screening
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The term "financial toxicity" or "hardship" is a patient-reported outcome that results from the material costs of cancer care, the psychological impacts of these costs, and the coping strategies that patients use to deal with the strain that includes delaying or forgoing care. However, little is known about the impact of financial toxicity on cancer screening. We examined the effects of financial toxicity on the use of screening tests for prostate and colon cancer. We hypothesized that greater financial hardship would show an association with decreased prevalence of cancer screening. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey-based US study included men and women aged ≥50 years from the National Health Interview Survey database from January through December 2018. A financial hardship score (FHS) between 0 and 10 was formulated by summarizing the responses from 10 financial toxicity dichotomic questions (yes or no), with a higher score associated with greater financial hardship. Primary outcomes were self-reported occurrence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood testing and colonoscopy for prostate and colon cancer screening, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 13,439 individual responses were collected. A total of 9,277 (69.03%) people had undergone colonoscopies, and 3,455 (70.94%) men had a PSA test. White, married, working men were more likely to undergo PSA testing and colonoscopy. Individuals who had not had a PSA test or colonoscopy had higher mean FHSs than those who underwent these tests (0.70 and 0.79 vs 0.47 and 0.61, respectively; P≤.001 for both). Multivariable logistic regression models demonstrated that a higher FHS was associated with a decreased odds ratio for having a PSA test (0.916; 95% CI, 0.867-0.967; P=.002) and colonoscopy (0.969; 95% CI, 0.941-0.998; P=.039). CONCLUSIONS: Greater financial hardship is suggested to be associated with a decreased probability of having prostate and colon cancer screening. Healthcare professionals should be aware that financial toxicity can impact not only cancer treatment but also cancer screening.
Keywords: prostate specific antigen; colonic neoplasms; mass screening; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; prostate; colon tumor; prostate tumor; cross-sectional study; cross-sectional studies; early detection of cancer; humans; human; male; early cancer diagnosis; financial stress
Journal Title: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume: 20
Issue: 9
ISSN: 1540-1405
Publisher: Harborside Press  
Date Published: 2022-09-01
Start Page: 981
End Page: 988
Language: English
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7036
PUBMED: 36075394
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 October 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Fumiko Chino
    223 Chino