Comparison of ablation defect on MR imaging with computer simulation estimated treatment zone following irreversible electroporation of patient prostate Journal Article


Authors: Srimathveeravalli, G.; Cornelis, F.; Mashni, J.; Takaki, H.; Durack, J. C.; Solomon, S. B.; Coleman, J. A.
Article Title: Comparison of ablation defect on MR imaging with computer simulation estimated treatment zone following irreversible electroporation of patient prostate
Abstract: To determine whether patient specific numerical simulations of irreversible electroporation (IRE) of the prostate correlates with the treatment effect seen on follow-up MR imaging. Computer models were created using intra-operative US images, post-treatment follow-up MR images and clinical data from six patients receiving IRE. Isoelectric contours drawn using simulation results were compared with MR imaging to estimate the energy threshold separating treated and untreated tissue. Simulation estimates of injury to the neurovascular bundle and rectum were compared with clinical follow-up and patient reported outcomes. At the electric field strength of 700 V/cm, simulation estimated electric field distribution was not different from the ablation defect seen on follow-up MR imaging (p = 0.43). Simulation predicted cross sectional area of treatment (mean 532.33 ± 142.32 mm2) corresponded well with the treatment zone seen on MR imaging (mean 540.16 ± 237.13 mm2). Simulation results did not suggest injury to the rectum or neurovascular bundle, matching clinical follow-up at 3 months. Computer simulation estimated zone of irreversible electroporation in the prostate at 700 V/cm was comparable to measurements made on follow-up MR imaging. Numerical simulation may aid treatment planning for irreversible electroporation of the prostate in patients. © 2016, Srimathveeravalli et al.
Keywords: prostate; computer simulation; ablation; irreversible electroporation
Journal Title: SpringerPlus
Volume: 5
ISSN: 2193-1801
Publisher: SpringerOpen  
Date Published: 2016-02-29
Start Page: 219
Language: English
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1879-0
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4771651
PUBMED: 27026913
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 April 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jonathan Coleman
    341 Coleman
  2. Stephen Solomon
    422 Solomon
  3. Jeremy Charles Durack
    116 Durack
  4. Haruyuki Takaki
    7 Takaki
  5. Joseph Wadie Mashni
    10 Mashni