Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma. A comparative study with CT Journal Article


Authors: Imbriaco, M.; Akhurst, T.; Hilton, S.; Yeung, H. W. D.; Macapinlac, H. A.; Mazumdar, M.; Pace, L.; Kemeny, N.; Erdi, Y.; Cohen, A.; Fong, Y.; Guillem, J.; Larson, S. M.
Article Title: Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma. A comparative study with CT
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the clinical accuracy of whole-body 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal carcinoma in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Forty patients with suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma based on either progressive serial carcinoemrbyonic antigen (CEA) serum elevation or positive/equivocal CT findings underwent whole-body FDG-PET. PET results were compared with those of CT and correlated to the final histopathological and clinical findings. Results: A final diagnosis was obtained at 93 sites in 35 patients by histology and in 5 patients by clinical follow up of at least 6 months. Of the 93 sites, 53 were determined to be malignant and 40 benign. FDG-PET evaluated on a 5-point scale (0-4) showed a positive and negative predictive value in the range of 96-98% and 83-93% respectively as the threshold for positivity was moved from 0 through 3. By comparison, CT, also evaluated on a 5-point scale showed a positive and negative predictive value in the range of 75-88%> and 67-71%> respectively. The area under the fitted receiver operating characteristic curve for PET: APET = 0.96 ± 0.02 was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that observed for CT: ACT = 0.77 ± 0.06. The distribution of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) showed that all negative lesions have SUVmax below 5.0 whereas 75% of positive lesions were above 5.0 pointing to the fact that disease positivity is more likely in lesions with high SUV values. Conclusion: The results of this study confirm that whole-body FDG-PET is more accurate than conventional CT in the staging of patients with suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Copyright © 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: pet; ct; fdg; colon neoplasms
Journal Title: Clinical Positron Imaging
Volume: 3
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1095-0397
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2000-05-01
Start Page: 107
End Page: 114
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s1095-0397(00)00045-5
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 11008100
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 18 November 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Madhu Mazumdar
    127 Mazumdar
  2. Henry W D Yeung
    126 Yeung
  3. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  4. Alfred M Cohen
    244 Cohen
  5. Susan Hilton
    28 Hilton
  6. Yuman Fong
    775 Fong
  7. Timothy J Akhurst
    139 Akhurst
  8. Yusuf E Erdi
    118 Erdi
  9. Steven M Larson
    958 Larson
  10. Nancy Kemeny
    543 Kemeny