A survival model for fractionated radiotherapy with an application to prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Zaider, M.; Zelefsky, M. J.; Harin, L. G.; Tsodikov, A. D.; Yakovlev, A. Y.; Leibel, S. A.
Article Title: A survival model for fractionated radiotherapy with an application to prostate cancer
Abstract: This paper explores the applicability of a mechanistic survival model, based on the distribution of clonogens surviving a course of fractionated radiation therapy, to clinical data on patients with prostate cancer. The study was carried out using data on 1100 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. The patients were stratified by radiation dose (group 1: <67.5 Gy; group 2: 67.5-72.5 Gy; group 3: 72.5-77.5 Gy; group 4: 77.5-87.5 Gy) and prognosis category (favourable, intermediate and unfavourable as defined by pre-treatment PSA and Gleason score). A relapse was recorded when tumour recurrence was diagnosed or when three successive prostate specific antigen (PSA) elevations were observed from a post-treatment nadir PSA level. PSA relapse-free survival was used as the primary end point. The model, which is based on an iterated Yule process, is specified in terms of three parameters: the mean number of tumour clonogens that survive the treatment, the mean of the progression time of post-treatment tumour development and its standard deviation. The model parameters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The fact that the proposed model provides an excellent description both of the survivor function and of the hazard rate is prima facie evidence of the validity of the model because closeness of the two survivor functions (empirical and model-based) does not generally imply closeness of the corresponding hazard rates. The estimated cure probabilities for the favourable group are 0.80, 0.74 and 0.87 (for dose groups 1-3, respectively); for the intermediate group: 0.25, 0.51, 0.58 and 0.78 (for dose groups 1-4, respectively) and for the unfavourable group: 0.0, 0.27, 0.33 and 0.64 (for dose groups 1-4, respectively). The distribution of progression time to tumour relapse was found to be independent of prognosis group but dependent on dose. As the dose increases the mean progression time decreases (41, 28.5, 26.2 and 14.7 months for dose groups 1-4, respectively). This analysis confirms that, in terms of cure rate, dose escalation has a significant positive effect only in the intermediate and unfavourable groups. It was found that progression time is inversely proportional to dose, which means that patients recurring in higher dose groups have shorter recurrence times, yet these groups have better survival, particularly long-term. The explanation for this seemingly illogical observation lies in the fact that less aggressive tumours, potentially recurring after a long period of time, are cured by higher doses and do not contribute to the recurrence pattern. As a result, patients in higher dose groups are less likely to recur; however, if they do, they tend to recur earlier. The estimated hazard rates for prostate cancer pass through a clear-cut maximum, thus revealing a time period with especially high values of instantaneous cancer-specific risk; the estimates appear to be nonproportional across dose strata.
Keywords: cancer survival; controlled study; treatment outcome; disease-free survival; major clinical study; cancer localization; cancer recurrence; cancer growth; cancer radiotherapy; radiation dose; prostate specific antigen; radiotherapy; recurrence; data base; oncology; cancer model; time; time factors; dose-response relationship, radiation; risk; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; clinical study; tumors; dosimetry; probability; models, statistical; three dimensional imaging; patient coding; scoring system; patient treatment; dose fractionation; parameter; clinical observation; clonogenesis; maximum likelihood method; fractionated radiotherapy; maximum likelihood estimation; humans; prognosis; human; male; priority journal; article; hazard; thermal stratification; mechanistic survival model
Journal Title: Physics in Medicine and Biology
Volume: 46
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0031-9155
Publisher: IOP Publishing Ltd  
Date Published: 2001-10-01
Start Page: 2745
End Page: 2758
Language: English
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/10/315
PUBMED: 11686286
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 21 May 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael J Zelefsky
    754 Zelefsky
  2. Steven A Leibel
    252 Leibel
  3. Marco Zaider
    171 Zaider