Comparison of high-dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Spratt, D. E.; Zumsteg, Z. S.; Ghadjar, P.; Kollmeier, M. A.; Pei, X.; Cohen, G.; Polkinghorn, W.; Yamada, Y.; Zelefsky, M. J.
Article Title: Comparison of high-dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
Abstract: Objective To compare tumour control and toxicity outcomes with the use of high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone or brachytherapy combined with IMRT (combo-RT) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Between 1997 and 2010, 870 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated at our institution with either 86.4 Gy of IMRT alone (n = 470) or combo-RT consisting of brachytherapy combined with 50.4 Gy of IMRT (n = 400). Brachytherapy consisted of low-dose-rate permanent interstitial implantation in 260 patients and high-dose-rate temporary implantation in 140 patients. The median (range) follow-up for the entire cohort was 5.3 (1-14) years. Results For IMRT alone vs combo-RT, 7-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) rates were 81.4 vs 92.0% (P < 0.001), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.0 vs 97.2% (P = 0.04), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that combo-RT was associated with better PSA-RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.66], P < 0.001), and better DMFS (HR, 0.41 [0.18-0.92], P = 0.03). A higher incidence of acute genitourinary (GU) grade 2 (35.8 vs 18.9%; P < 0.01) and acute GU grade 3 (2.3 vs 0.4%; P = 0.03) toxicities occurred in the combo-RT group than in the IMRT-alone group. Most acute toxicity resolved. Late toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 7-year actuarial late toxicity rates for grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were 4.6 vs 4.1% (P = 0.89), for grade 3 GI toxicity 0.4 vs 1.4% (P = 0.36), for grade 2 GU toxicity 19.4 vs 21.2% (P = 0.14), and grade 3 GU toxicity 3.1 vs 1.4% (P = 0.74) for the IMRT vs the combo-RT group, respectively. Conclusions Enhanced dose escalation using combo-RT was associated with superior PSA-RFS and DMFS outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer compared with high-dose IMRT alone at a dose of 86.4 Gy. While acute GU toxicities were more prevalent in the combo-RT group, the incidence of late GI and GU toxicities was similar between the treatment groups. © 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.
Keywords: controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; major clinical study; intensity modulated radiation therapy; cancer risk; comparative study; radiation dose; follow up; prostate specific antigen; cohort analysis; prostate cancer; gastrointestinal toxicity; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; psa; brachytherapy; toxicity; urogenital tract disease; recurrence free survival; distant metastases; intermediate risk patient; distant metastasis free survival; human; male; priority journal; article; urogenital tract toxicity
Journal Title: BJU International
Volume: 114
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1464-4096
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2014-09-01
Start Page: 360
End Page: 367
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12514
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24447404
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 1 October 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael J Zelefsky
    754 Zelefsky
  2. Yoshiya Yamada
    479 Yamada
  3. Gilad N Cohen
    180 Cohen
  4. Marisa A Kollmeier
    227 Kollmeier
  5. Zachary Stephan Zumsteg
    36 Zumsteg
  6. Daniel Eidelberg Spratt
    77 Spratt
  7. Xin Pei
    134 Pei