Abstract: |
Purpose: We report on a retrospective comparison of biochemical outcomes using an ultra-high dose of conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. a lower dose of IMRT combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy to increase the biologically effective dose of IMRT. Methods: Patients received IMRT of 86.4. Gy (n= 470) or HDR brachytherapy (21. Gy in three fractions) followed by IMRT of 50.4. Gy (n= 160). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined as PSA nadir. +. 2. Median followup was 53 months for IMRT alone and 47 months for HDR. Results: The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) for HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT were 100% vs. 98%, 98% vs. 84%, and 93% vs. 71%, for National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- (p= 0.71), intermediate- (p< 0.001), and high-risk (p= 0.23) groups, respectively. Treatment (p= 0.0006), T stage (p< 0.0001), Gleason score (p< 0.0001), pretreatment PSA (p= 0.0037), risk group (p< 0.0001), and lack of androgen-deprivation therapy (p= 0.0005) were significantly associated with improved PRFS on univariate analysis. HDR plus IMRT vs. ultra-high-dose IMRT (p= 0.0012, hazard ratio [HR]. = 0.184); age (p= 0.0222, HR. = 0.965); and risk group (p< 0.0001, HR. = 2.683) were associated with improved PRFS on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Dose escalation of IMRT by adding HDR brachytherapy provided improved PRFS in the treatment of prostate cancer compared with ultra-high-dose IMRT, independent of risk group on multivariate analysis, with the most significant benefit for intermediate-risk patients. © 2010 American Brachytherapy Society. |