Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis Journal Article


Authors: Martin, R.; Paty, P. B.; Fong, Y.; Grace, A.; Cohen, A.; DeMatteo, R.; Jarnagin, W.; Blumgart, L.
Article Title: Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of synchronous resectable colorectal liver metastasis has not been defined. The aims of this study were to review our experience with synchronous colorectal metastasis and to define the safety of simultaneous versus staged resection of the colon and liver. STUDY DESIGN: From September 1984 through November 2001, 240 patients were treated surgically for primary adenocarcinoma of the large bowel and synchronous hepatic metastasis. Clinicopathologic, operative, and perioperative data were reviewed to evaluate selection criteria, operative methods, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients underwent simultaneous resection of a colorectal primary and hepatic metastasis in a single operation (Group I), and 106 patients underwent staged operations (Group II). Simultaneous resections tend to be performed for right colon primaries (p < 0.001), smaller (p < 0.01) and fewer (p < 0.001) liver metastases, and less extensive liver resection (p < 0.001). Complications were less common in the simultaneous resection group, with 65 patients (49%) sustaining 142 complications, compared with 71 patients (67%) sustaining 197 complications for both hospitalizations in the staged resection group (p < 0.003). Patients having simultaneous resection required fewer days in the hospital (median 10 days versus 18 days, p = 0.001). Perioperative mortality was similar (simultaneous, n = 3; staged, n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous colon and liver resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis. By avoiding a second laparotomy, the overall complication rate is reduced, with no change in operative mortality. Given its reduced morbidity, shorter treatment time, and similar cancer outcomes, simultaneous resection should be considered a safe option in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal metastasis. © 2003 by the American College of Surgeons.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; retrospective studies; major clinical study; patient selection; liver neoplasms; united states; adenocarcinoma; morbidity; postoperative complication; colorectal neoplasms; liver metastasis; operation duration; liver resection; outcomes research; surgical mortality; intermethod comparison; hepatectomy; colorectal surgery; safety; perioperative period; rectum cancer; colon adenocarcinoma; colectomy; humans; human; male; female; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume: 197
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1072-7515
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2003-08-01
Start Page: 233
End Page: 242
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(03)00390-9
PUBMED: 12892803
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 12 September 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Philip B Paty
    499 Paty
  2. Leslie H Blumgart
    352 Blumgart
  3. Ronald P DeMatteo
    637 DeMatteo
  4. Andrew W Grace
    4 Grace
  5. Robert Martin
    20 Martin
  6. William R Jarnagin
    903 Jarnagin
  7. Yuman Fong
    775 Fong