Identification of novel prognosticators of outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Journal Article


Authors: Wreesmann, V. B.; Shi, W.; Thaler, H. T.; Poluri, A.; Kraus, D. H.; Pfister, D.; Shaha, A. R.; Shah, J. P.; Rao, P. H.; Singh, B.
Article Title: Identification of novel prognosticators of outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Abstract: Purpose: The goal of this study was to identify chromosomal aberrations associated with poor outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients and Methods: We assessed the global genomic composition of 82 HNSCCs from previously untreated patients with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The CGH data were subcategorized into individual cytogenetic bands. Only genomic aberrations occurring in more than 5% of cases were analyzed, and redundancies were eliminated. Each aberration was submitted to univariate analysis to assess its relationship with disease-specific survival (DSS). We used Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to adjust P values for the log-rank approximate χ2 statistics for each abnormality and further applied the Hochberg-Benjamini procedure to adjust the P values for multiple testing of the large number of abnormalities. We then submitted abnormalities whose univariate tests resulted in an adjusted P value of less than .15 together with significant demographic/clinical variables to stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression. We again verified and adjusted P values for the χ2 approximation of the final model by MCS. Results: CGH analysis revealed a recurrent pattern of chromosomal aberrations typical for HNSCC. Univariate analysis revealed 38 abnormalities that were correlated with DSS. After controlling for multiple comparisons and confounding effects of stage, five chromosomal aberrations were significantly associated with outcome, including amplification at 11q13, gain of 12q24, and losses at 5q11, 6q14, and 21q11 (MCS adjusted P = .0009 to P = .01). Conclusion: HNSCC contains a complex pattern of chromosomal aberrations. A sequential approach to control for multiple comparisons and effect of confounding variables allows the identification of clinically relevant aberrations. The significance of each individual abnormality merits further consideration. © 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: survival; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; disease-free survival; middle aged; survival analysis; genetics; squamous cell carcinoma; carcinoma, squamous cell; disease free survival; gene amplification; proportional hazards models; cytogenetics; chromosome aberration; proportional hazards model; head and neck neoplasms; gene identification; outcomes research; chromosome aberrations; nucleic acid hybridization; comparative genomic hybridization; chromosome 12q; head and neck tumor; chromosome 11q; head and neck carcinoma; chromosome 6q; monte carlo method; chromosome 5q; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; priority journal; article; chromosome 21q
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 22
Issue: 19
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2004-10-01
Start Page: 3965
End Page: 3972
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.01.094
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 15459219
DOI/URL:
Notes: J. Clin. Oncol. -- Cited By (since 1996):35 -- Export Date: 16 June 2014 -- CODEN: JCOND -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Pulivarth H Rao
    66 Rao
  2. Weiji Shi
    121 Shi
  3. Dennis Kraus
    268 Kraus
  4. Ashok R Shaha
    697 Shaha
  5. Bhuvanesh Singh
    242 Singh
  6. David G Pfister
    389 Pfister
  7. Jatin P Shah
    721 Shah
  8. Howard T Thaler
    245 Thaler