A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle Journal Article


Authors: Morrow, M.; Chatterton, R. T. Jr; Rademaker, A. W.; Hou, N.; Jordan, V. C.; Hendrick, R. E.; Khan, S. A.
Article Title: A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle
Abstract: Mammographic breast density has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint in breast cancer prevention studies, but little is known about its variability over time, particularly in relation to menstrual cycle phase. The purpose of this study was to assess variation in breast density on digital mammograms using quantitative and qualitative density measures. Menstrual cycle phase was determined by salivary estradiol and progesterone assays. 73 healthy subjects with regular menses had 1-3 mammograms with paired saliva collection during a 12-month period. The mean difference in density as a percentage of the mean density was calculated for follicular-luteal (n = 50), luteal-luteal (n = 26) and follicular-follicular (n = 23) pairs in the same woman using the same breast. Two density measures (measurement of dense area and BIRADS) were used. The mean luteal density exceeded the mean follicular density by 7.1-9.2%, but density differences between luteal pairs and follicular pairs did not exceed 5%. The intraclass correlation for measurement of dense area was greater than 85% in all phases of the menstrual cycle, but was below 50% for BIRADS for luteal-follicular and follicular-follicular pairs. Our study provides estimates of the amount of variation in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle, and that inherent in repeated density measurement in premenopausal women, and suggests that menstrual phase of mammographic evaluation should be controlled for in intervention studies where density is being used as a surrogate measure. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; middle aged; major clinical study; prospective study; reproducibility of results; image analysis; breast; mammography; quantitative analysis; cross-sectional studies; premenopause; estradiol; qualitative analysis; progesterone; digital mammography; breast density; mammogram; mammographic density; menstrual cycle; follicular phase; luteal phase; saliva level
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 121
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2010-06-01
Start Page: 565
End Page: 574
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0496-9
PUBMED: 19669673
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 2" - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: BCTRD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow