Shape-constraint region growing for delineation of hepatic metastases on contrast-enhanced computed tomograph scans Journal Article


Authors: Zhao, B.; Schwartz, L. H.; Jiang, L.; Colville, J.; Moskowitz, C.; Wang, L.; Lefkowitz, R.; Liu, F.; Kalaigian, J.
Article Title: Shape-constraint region growing for delineation of hepatic metastases on contrast-enhanced computed tomograph scans
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to develop a shape-constraint region-growing algorithm to automatically delineate liver metastases on computed tomography images and to compare automated tumor measurements with those outlined manually by radiologists. METHODS: The algorithm starts with a manual selection of a seed lesion region of interest (ROI). Based on intensity distributions of the seed ROI and the liver parenchyma, several parameters are computed and used to adaptively guide the region growing. To prevent the region growing from leaking into surrounding tissues of similar characteristics, specific shape constraints, including a local shape, a global shape, and a gravity-shift index, are developed to jointly control the iteration of the region growing. The algorithm was applied to 59 lesions in 14 patients with liver metastases. The maximal diameter (unidimension), the product of the maximal and maximal perpendicular diameters (bidimension), and the area in the axial plane were calculated for each of the segmented lesions. Three independent radiologists manually measured all the lesions once, and one of the radiologists measured each lesion 3 times. For each measurement, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was used to assess the pairwise agreement between the computer and the different radiologists, and the overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC) was used to assess the agreement between the computer and the multiple radiologists and between the one radiologist's 3 readings. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 59 (89.8%) lesions in 14 patients with liver metastases were successfully segmented using this algorithm. The algorithm achieved a median accuracy of 88.0%. CCCs/OCCCs ranged from 0.943 to 0.999 with 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: High accuracy and CCCs/OCCCs suggested that measurements made by the computer were very similar to those made by the radiologists. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Keywords: clinical article; controlled study; retrospective studies; liver neoplasms; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; reproducibility of results; computer assisted tomography; tomography, x-ray computed; algorithms; confidence interval; liver metastasis; liver; computer; correlation coefficient; radiologist; algorithm; contrast enhancement; artificial intelligence; pattern recognition, automated; measurement; intermethod comparison; contrast media; tumor growth; liver parenchyma; radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted; computer analysis; liver metastases; computed tomography (ct); radiographic image enhancement; oncological parameters; autoanalysis; region growing; size measurement
Journal Title: Investigative Radiology
Volume: 41
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0020-9996
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2006-10-01
Start Page: 753
End Page: 762
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000236907.81400.18
PUBMED: 16971799
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 9" - "Export Date: 4 June 2012" - "CODEN: INVRA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Lawrence H Schwartz
    306 Schwartz
  2. Binsheng Zhao
    55 Zhao
  3. Chaya S. Moskowitz
    278 Moskowitz
  4. Fan Ying Liu
    22 Liu
  5. Liang Wang
    35 Wang
  6. Li Jiang
    6 Jiang