Confirmatory biopsy outcomes in patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer: Implications for early management Journal Article


Authors: Leni, R.; Vertosick, E. A.; Liso, N.; Akin, O.; Carlsson, S. V.; Montorsi, F.; Briganti, A.; Eastham, J. A.; Fine, S. W.; Vickers, A. J.; Ehdaie, B.
Article Title: Confirmatory biopsy outcomes in patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer: Implications for early management
Abstract: Background and objective: Guideline recommendations regarding early management of grade group (GG) 2 prostate cancer with confirmatory biopsy (cBx) are not well established. Our aim was to determine which patients with GG 2 cancer should undergo cBx before treatment decision-making by evaluating the probability of downgrading to GG 1 or no cancer on cBx. Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with GG 2 prostate cancer who underwent cBx. We modeled the probability of having no Gleason pattern 4 on cBx according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on MRI, total length of pattern 4 across all cores on initial Bx, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density. Key findings and limitations: Among 301 patients, 62 (21%) were downgraded to GG 1 and 23 (8%) had no cancer on cBx. For patients with nonsuspicious MRI findings (PI-RADS 1–3; n = 123), the probability of having no pattern 4 on CBx was 34%, 20%, and 11% for 1, 2, and 3 mm of pattern 4 at initial Bx. For PI-RADS 4–5 without EPE on MRI (n = 146), the corresponding probabilities were 18%, 10%, and 5%. Patients with EPE on MRI (n = 32) had low probability (<10%) of having no pattern 4 on cBx irrespective of pattern 4 on initial Bx. Results using a model based on PSA density followed a similar trend. After applying the model in a cohort of patients with GG 2 cancer who immediately underwent surgery (n = 2275), we estimated that two-thirds would be eligible for cBx before treatment using a probability threshold of 5–10% for avoiding immediate surgery. Conclusions and clinical implications: Patients with GG 2 prostate cancer, no evidence of EPE, and a few millimeters of pattern 4 should undergo cBx before proceeding to surgery. Further research should define the oncologic risk for such patients, refine the criteria for cBx in GG 2 disease, and assess methods for quantifying pattern 4 length in MRI-targeted cores. Patient summary: For patients with grade group (GG) 2 prostate cancer, we found that the amount of Gleason pattern 4 cancer in the initial biopsy, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) density, and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) findings help to identify men who are likely to be downgraded to less aggressive GG 1 cancer or no cancer at all on a repeat confirmatory biopsy. We assessed these predictors in a group of patients with similar characteristics who underwent immediate surgery, and found that approximately two-thirds would benefit from a confirmatory biopsy. © 2025 The Author(s)
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; middle aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; cancer patient; comparative study; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; cancer grading; medical decision making; prostate specific antigen; cohort analysis; retrospective study; prostate cancer; gleason score; antigen specificity; probability; prostate biopsy; radical prostatectomy; intermediate risk; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; human; male; article; prostate imaging reporting and data system; mri guided biopsy; confirmatory biopsy
Journal Title: European Urology Open Science
Volume: 72
ISSN: 2666-1691
Publisher: Elsevier BV  
Date Published: 2025-02-01
Start Page: 46
End Page: 53
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.012
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11872641
PUBMED: 40034920
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: Riccardo Leni -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers
  2. Behfar Ehdaie
    173 Ehdaie
  3. James Eastham
    537 Eastham
  4. Samson W Fine
    461 Fine
  5. Oguz Akin
    264 Akin
  6. Sigrid Viktoria Carlsson
    220 Carlsson
  7. Emily Vertosick
    134 Vertosick
  8. Nicole E Benfante
    160 Benfante
  9. Riccardo Leni
    3 Leni