Epichaperome-targeted myocardial imaging by (124)I-PU-H71 PET Journal Article


Authors: Mahajan, S.; Grkovski, M.; Staton, K. D.; Ravassa, S.; Domfe, K.; Strauss, H. W.; Humm, J. L.; Zanzonico, P. B.; Beattie, B. J.; Cho, I.; Burnazi, E. M.; Fox, J. J.; Schöder, H.; Osborne, J. R.; Youn, T.; Jhaveri, K.; Chiosis, G.; Dunphy, M. P.
Article Title: Epichaperome-targeted myocardial imaging by (124)I-PU-H71 PET
Abstract: Background: The small molecule radiotracer 124I-PU-H71 is an imaging biomarker of epichaperome formation. The tracer has been established to localize in tissues under chronic stress, specifically in cancer cells and neurodegenerative brain cells. A first-in-human imaging trial using positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer patients revealed unexpected tracer accumulation in the myocardium. Purpose: To describe human 124I-PU-H71 myocardial biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in a series of cancer patients with no history of cardiovascular disease. Methods: 25 cancer patients (age 22–75 years, M:F − 7:18) with no history of cardiovascular disease received intravenous injections with microdose 124I-PU-H71 while at rest, followed by dynamic and gated/non-gated PET image data acquisitions. Region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of left ventricular myocardium (LVmyo) and background left atrium quantified tracer concentrations as standardized uptake value (SUV) and uptake ratios. Kinetic rate constants were evaluated by a two-tissue compartment model. Results: Myocardial accumulation of 124I-PU-H71 was prominent in all patients, with median LVmyo SUVmean (interquartile range, IQR) of 2.8 (IQR, 2.13–3.29), 2.5 (IQR, 1.94–2.98), 2.4 (IQR, 1.73–3.31) and 1.0 (IQR, 0.61–2.45), and median LVmyo/blood-pool ratios of 1.9 (IQR, 1.57–2.38), 2.0 (IQR, 1.53–2.32), 3.6 (IQR, 2.91–4.06) and 3.9 (IQR, 2.62–5.08) at 1–9 min, 14–23 min, 3–4 h and 21–25 h, respectively on non-gated PET images. Myocardium showed peak uptake within 2 min post-injection, with sustained myocardial tracer-concentration at 4 h post-injection. Pharmacokinetic modeling revealed median K1 = 0.45 ml/min/g (IQR, 0.38–0.62); k2 = 0.47 min− 1 (IQR, 0.27–0.71); k3 = 0.16 min− 1 (IQR, 0.09–0.26); and k4 = 0.0038 min− 1 (IQR, 0.0015–0.0057). Regional assessment demonstrated essentially uniform tracer uptake in LV and myocardial segments; with normal LVEF in all patients (mean 57.7 ± 3.5%); and no patients suffered cardiac events over subsequent 12-month period. Conclusion: Our study finds human myocardial epichaperome expression, as quantified by 124I-PU-H71 PET. Our data indicates PU-H71 PET merits further study as a myocardial epichaperome biomarker, with potential application in drug development, possibly as a biomarker in subclinical cardiac dysfunction. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine Molecular Imaging and Therapy (AIMN) 2024.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; protein expression; aged; unclassified drug; cancer patient; positron emission tomography; prospective study; image analysis; blood sampling; cardiovascular disease; radioactivity; positron-emission tomography; drug metabolism; tracer; echocardiography; heart left ventricle ejection fraction; bioaccumulation; pharmacokinetics; heart muscle perfusion; cardiovascular risk factor; peptides and proteins; pu-h71; iterative reconstruction; maximum standardized uptake value; heart muscle blood flow; iodine-124; plasma clearance; radiolabeling; human; male; female; article; epichaperome; cardiac muscle; mean standardized uptake value; myocardial imaging; rate constant; cancer and cardiovascular disease; 124i pu h71
Journal Title: Clinical and Translational Imaging
Volume: 12
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2281-5872
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2024-12-01
Start Page: 619
End Page: 627
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s40336-024-00658-9
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11810128
PUBMED: 39935517
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Mark Dunphy -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Josef J Fox
    71 Fox
  2. Heiko Schoder
    544 Schoder
  3. Mark Phillip Dunphy
    81 Dunphy
  4. Harry W Strauss
    164 Strauss
  5. Komal Lachhman Jhaveri
    202 Jhaveri
  6. Eva M Burnazi
    25 Burnazi
  7. John Laurence Humm
    433 Humm
  8. Pat B Zanzonico
    355 Zanzonico
  9. Gabriela Chiosis
    279 Chiosis
  10. Bradley Beattie
    131 Beattie
  11. Kevin David Staton
    14 Staton
  12. Sonia Mahajan
    20 Mahajan
  13. Insang Cho
    1 Cho