Reduced-distortion diffusion weighted imaging for head and neck radiotherapy Journal Article


Authors: Aliotta, E.; Paudyal, R.; Dresner, A.; Shukla-Dave, A.; Lee, N.; Cerviño, L.; Otazo, R.; Yu, V. Y.
Article Title: Reduced-distortion diffusion weighted imaging for head and neck radiotherapy
Abstract: Background and purpose: Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) has potential value in guiding head and neck (HN) cancer radiotherapy. However, clinical translation has been hindered by severe distortions in standard single-shot Echo-Planar-Imaging (ssEPI) and prolonged scan time and low SNR in Turbo-Spin-Echo (ssTSE) sequences. In this study, we evaluate “multi-shot” (ms) msEPI and msTSE acquisitions in the context of HN radiotherapy. Materials and methods: ssEPI, ssTSE, msEPI with 2 and 3 shots (2sEPI, 3sEPI), and msTSE DWI were acquired in a phantom, healthy volunteers (N=10), and patients with HN cancer (N=5) on a 3-Tesla wide-bore MRI in radiotherapy simulation RF coil setup, with matched spatial resolution (2x2x5mm) and b = 0, 200, 800 s/mm2. Geometric distortions measured with deformable vector field (DVF) and contour analysis, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and signal-to-noise-ratio efficiency (SNReff) were quantified for all scans. Results: All techniques significantly (P<1x10-3) reduced distortions compared with ssEPI (DVFmean = 3.1 ± 1.3 mm). Distortions were marginally lower for msTSE (DVFmean = 1.5 ± 0.6 mm) than ssTSE (1.8 ± 0.9 mm), but were slightly higher with 2sEPI and 3sEPI (2.6 ± 1.0 mm, 2.2 ± 1.0 mm). SNReff reduced with decreasing distortion with ssEPI=21.9 ± 7.9, 2sEPI=15.1 ± 5.0, 3sEPI=12.1 ± 4.5, ssTSE=6.0 ± 1.6, and msTSE=5.7 ± 1.9 for b = 0 images. Phantom ADC values were consistent across all protocols (errors ≤ 0.03x10-3mm2/s), but in vivo ADC values were ∼ 4 % lower with msEPI and ∼ 12 % lower with ssTSE/msTSE compared with ssEPI. Conclusions: msEPI and TSE acquisitions exhibited improved geometric distortion at the cost of SNReff and scan time. While msTSE exhibited the least distortion, 3sEPI may offer an appealing middle-ground with improved geometric fidelity but superior efficiency and in vivo ADC quantification. © 2024 The Authors
Keywords: clinical article; controlled study; aged; cancer radiotherapy; comparative study; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; outcome assessment; clinical assessment; signal noise ratio; in vivo study; head and neck cancer; geometry; spinal cord; clinical evaluation; diffusion weighted imaging; wart virus; apparent diffusion coefficient; human; male; female; article; povidone
Journal Title: Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Volume: 32
ISSN: 2405-6316
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.  
Date Published: 2024-10-01
Start Page: 100653
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100653
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11466654
PUBMED: 39399877
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Eric Aliotta -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Nancy Y. Lee
    871 Lee
  2. Amita Dave
    137 Dave
  3. Ramesh Paudyal
    38 Paudyal
  4. Victoria Yuiwen Yu
    20 Yu
  5. Eric Aliotta
    15 Aliotta