An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma patients in the United States Journal Article


Authors: Oluwole, O. O.; Patel, A. R.; Vadgama, S.; Smith, N. J.; Blissett, R.; Feng, C.; Dickinson, M.; Johnston, P. B.; Perales, M. A.
Article Title: An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma patients in the United States
Abstract: Aims: This economic evaluation of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus previous standard of care (SOC; salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue) in the second line (2L) large B-cell lymphoma population is an update of previous economic models that contained immature survival data. Methods: This analysis is based on primary overall survival (OS) ZUMA-7 clinical trial data (median follow-up of 47.2 months), from a United States (US) payer perspective, with a model time horizon of 50 years. Mixture cure models were used to extrapolate updated survival data; subsequent treatment data and costs were updated. Patients who remained in the event-free survival state by 5 years were assumed to have achieved long-term remission and not require subsequent treatment. Results: Substantial survival and quality of life benefits were observed despite 57% of patients in the SOC arm receiving subsequent cellular therapy: median model-projected (ZUMA-7 trial Kaplan–Meier estimated) OS was 78 months (median not reached) for axi-cel versus 25 months (31 months) for SOC, resulting in incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) difference of 1.63 in favor of axi-cel. Incrementally higher subsequent treatment costs were observed in the SOC arm due to substantial crossover to cellular therapies, thus, when considering the generally accepted willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY in the US, axi-cel was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98,040 per QALY. Conclusions: Results remained consistent across a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analysis, including a crossover adjusted analysis, suggesting that the mature OS data has significantly reduced the uncertainty of axi-cel’s cost-effectiveness in the 2L setting in the US. Deferring treatment with CAR T therapies after attempting a path to transplant may result in excess mortality, lower quality of life and would be an inefficient use of resources relative to 2L axi-cel. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; event free survival; survival analysis; major clinical study; overall survival; clinical trial; united states; follow up; quality of life; cost effectiveness analysis; lymphoma; remission; lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse; cost-effectiveness analysis; quality adjusted life year; cost-effectiveness; biological product; biological products; economic evaluation; diffuse large b cell lymphoma; humans; human; article; excess mortality; chimeric antigen receptor t-cell immunotherapy; car t-cell therapy; axicabtagene ciloleucel; willingness to pay; mixture cure model
Journal Title: Journal of Medical Economics
Volume: 27
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1369-6998
Publisher: Taylor & Francis  
Date Published: 2024-01-01
Start Page: 77
End Page: 83
Language: English
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2290832
PUBMED: 38053517
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11254511
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Miguel-Angel Perales
    918 Perales