Cost-effectiveness analysis of KTE-X19 CAR T therapy versus real-world standard of care in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma post BTKi in England Journal Article


Authors: Petersohn, S.; Salles, G.; Wang, M.; Wu, J.; Wade, S. W.; Simons, C. L.; Bennison, C.; Siddiqi, R.; Peng, W.; Kloos, I.; Castaigne, G.; Hess, G.
Article Title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of KTE-X19 CAR T therapy versus real-world standard of care in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma post BTKi in England
Abstract: Aims The objective of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of KTE-X19 versus standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) post-Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) treatment from a UK healthcare perspective. Materials and Methods A three-state partitioned survival model (pre-progression, post-progression and death) with a cycle length of one month was used to extrapolate progression-free and overall survival over a lifetime horizon. Population inputs along with KTE-X19 (brexucabtagene autoleucel) efficacy and safety data were derived from the single-arm trial ZUMA-2 (NCT02601313). The composition of SoC was informed by a literature-based meta-analysis, SoC efficacy data were obtained from the SCHOLAR-2 real-world study. Survival was modelled using standard parametric curves for SoC and a mixture-cure methodology for KTE-X19. It was assumed that patients whose disease had not progressed after five years experienced long-term remission. Costs, resource use and utility, and adverse event disutility inputs were obtained from published literature and publicly available data sources. An annual discount rate of 3.5% was applied to costs and health outcomes. Modelled outcomes for KTE-X19 and SoC included expected life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed. Results Estimated median survival was 5.96 years for KTE-X19 and 1.38 for SoC. Discounted LYs, QALYs and lifetime costs were 8.27, 5.99 and 385,765 pound for KTE-X19 versus 1.98, 1.48 and 79,742 pound for SoC, respectively. The KTE-X19 versus SoC cost per QALY was 67,713 pound and the cost per LY was 48,645 pound. Influential scenario analyses use alternative KTE-X19 survival curves and discount rates, and shorter time horizons. Conclusion Considering the survival and quality of life benefits compared to SoC, KTE-X19 for R/R MCL appears as a cost-effective treatment in the real-world UK setting.
Keywords: survival; mantle cell lymphoma; cost-effectiveness; t-cell therapy; chimeric antigen receptor t-cell; brexucabtagene autoleucel; kte-x19; relapsed refractory mantle cell lymphoma; cd19 antigens; investigators choice
Journal Title: Journal of Medical Economics
Volume: 25
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1369-6998
Publisher: Taylor & Francis  
Date Published: 2022-01-01
Start Page: 730
End Page: 740
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000806882600001
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2079317
PROVIDER: Clarivate Analytics Web of Science
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 35611697
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Gilles Andre Salles
    269 Salles