Safety and efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care in patients 65 years of age or older with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma Journal Article


Authors: Westin, J. R.; Locke, F. L.; Dickinson, M.; Ghobadi, A.; Elsawy, M.; van Meerten, T.; Miklos, D. B.; Ulrickson, M. L.; Perales, M. A.; Farooq, U.; Wannesson, L.; Leslie, L.; Kersten, M. J.; Jacobson, C. A.; Pagel, J. M.; Wulf, G.; Johnston, P.; Rapoport, A. P.; Du, L.; Vardhanabhuti, S.; Filosto, S.; Shah, J.; Snider, J. T.; Cheng, P.; To, C.; Oluwole, O. O.; Sureda, A.
Article Title: Safety and efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care in patients 65 years of age or older with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract: PURPOSE: Older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may be considered ineligible for curative-intent therapy including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Here, we report outcomes of a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years in ZUMA-7. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with LBCL refractory to or relapsed ≤12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy] or standard of care (SOC; 2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by HDT-ASCT). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: Fifty-one and 58 patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Median EFS was greater with axi-cel versus SOC (21.5 vs. 2.5 months; median follow-up: 24.3 months; HR, 0.276; descriptive P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was higher with axi-cel versus SOC (88% vs. 52%; OR, 8.81; descriptive P < 0.0001; complete response rate: 75% vs. 33%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 94% of axi-cel and 82% of SOC patients. No grade 5 cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred. In the quality-of-life analysis, the mean change in PRO scores from baseline at days 100 and 150 favored axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (descriptive P < 0.05). CAR T-cell expansion and baseline serum inflammatory profile were comparable in patients ≥65 and <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Axi-cel is an effective second-line curative-intent therapy with a manageable safety profile and improved PROs for patients ≥65 years with R/R LBCL. ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
Keywords: controlled study; aged; randomized controlled trial; pathology; health care quality; lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse; adoptive immunotherapy; immunotherapy, adoptive; cd19 antigen; antigens, cd19; biological product; biological products; standard of care; diffuse large b cell lymphoma; humans; human; axicabtagene ciloleucel
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 29
Issue: 10
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2023-05-15
Start Page: 1894
End Page: 1905
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-22-3136
PUBMED: 36999993
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10183830
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 June 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Miguel-Angel Perales
    913 Perales