Hemoptysis associated with percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: Development of critical events checklist and procedure outcomes Journal Article


Authors: Robson, P. C.; O'Connor, D.; Pardini, P.; Akard, T. F.; Dietrich, M. S.; Kotin, A.; Solomon, A.; Chawla, M.; Kennedy, M.; Solomon, S. B.
Article Title: Hemoptysis associated with percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: Development of critical events checklist and procedure outcomes
Abstract: Background: A percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) is performed to obtain tissue for a pathologic diagnosis. A PTNB is necessary before the initiation of many cancer treatments. There is a risk of hemoptysis, the expectoration of blood, with the possibility for adverse, life-threatening outcomes. A critical event checklist is a cognitive aid used in an emergency to ensure critical steps are followed. To date, there are no known checklists published for management of PTNB-related, life-threatening hemoptysis. The purpose of this report is to describe the development and implementation of a critical event checklist and the adoption of the checklist into hemoptysis management. Methods: In March 2017, a process improvement team convened to evaluate the hemoptysis response using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. The checklist was evaluated and updated through September 2019. The team educated interventional radiology (IR) clinicians on the new checklist and conducted simulations on its use. A retrospective chart review was performed on hemoptysis events between the 10-year period of October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2018 to evaluate the adoption of the checklist into practice. Results: There were 231 hemoptysis events occurring in 229 patients (2 with repeat biopsies). Before implementing the protocol and checklist, there were 166 (71.9%) hemoptysis events. After implementation, there were 65 (28.1%) events. The median amount of documented blood expectorated with hemoptysis was 100 mL (IQR 20.0-300.0). Twenty-six patients were admitted after PTNB for reasons related to the hemoptysis event (11.3%). During the procedure, four (1.7%) patients with hemoptysis suffered a cardiac arrest. Before implementation of the protocol and critical events checklist, nurses positioned patients in the lateral decubitus (LD) position in 40 of 162 (24.7%) cases. After implementation of the critical events checklist, nurses positioned patients in the LD position 42 of 65 cases (64.6%) (OR = 5.57(95% CI 2.99-10.367), p < .001). Discussion: IR nurses successfully adopted the checklist into management of hemoptysis events. The reported incidence of hemoptysis suggests a need for IR teams to prepare for and simulate hemoptysis events. Future research is needed to evaluate the change in patient outcomes before and after critical events checklist implementation. © 2021 Association for Radiologic & Imaging Nursing
Keywords: outcomes; hemoptysis; critical events checklist; percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy
Journal Title: Journal of Radiology Nursing
Volume: 40
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1546-0843
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: 221
End Page: 226
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2021.04.002
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8409504
PUBMED: 34483778
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 October 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Alan L Kotin
    15 Kotin
  2. Mohit Chawla
    48 Chawla
  3. Stephen Solomon
    424 Solomon