Depth of invasion versus tumour thickness in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Which measurement is the most practical and predictive of outcome? Journal Article


Authors: Salama, A. M.; Valero, C.; Katabi, N.; Khimraj, A.; Yuan, A.; Zanoni, D. K.; Ganly, I.; Patel, S. G.; Ghossein, R.; Xu, B.
Article Title: Depth of invasion versus tumour thickness in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Which measurement is the most practical and predictive of outcome?
Abstract: Aims: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging introduced depth of invasion (DOI) into the pT category of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. However, we noted multiple practical obstacles in accurately measuring DOI histologically in our daily practice. Methods and results: To compare the prognostic effects of DOI and tumour thickness (TT), a meticulous pathology review was conducted in a retrospective cohort of 293 patients with AJCC 7th edition pT1/T2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Overall survival (OS) and nodal metastasis rate at initial resection were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. We found that TT and DOI were highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.984. The upstage rate was only 6% (18 of 293 patients) when using TT in the pT stage compared with using DOI. More importantly, DOI and TT, as well as pT stage using DOI and pT stage using TT, performed identically in predicting risk of nodal metastasis and OS. Conclusions: We therefore propose to replace DOI, a complicated measurement with many challenges, with TT in the pT staging system. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Keywords: ajcc staging; depth of invasion; prognosis; oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma; tumour thickness
Journal Title: Histopathology
Volume: 79
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0309-0167
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: 325
End Page: 337
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/his.14291
PUBMED: 33112422
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8079561
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ronald A Ghossein
    482 Ghossein
  2. Snehal G Patel
    412 Patel
  3. Nora Katabi
    303 Katabi
  4. Ian Ganly
    430 Ganly
  5. Bin   Xu
    227 Xu
  6. Abeer Majid Salama
    16 Salama
  7. Anjanie Khimraj
    13 Khimraj
  8. Avery Yuan
    15 Yuan