Prognostic performance of current stage III oral cancer patients after curative intent resection: Evidence to support a revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System Journal Article


Authors: Amit, M.; Yen, T. C.; Liao, C. T.; Chaturvedi, P.; Agarwal, J. P.; Kowalski, L. P.; Kohler, H. F.; Ebrahimi, A.; Clark, J. R.; Cernea, C. R.; Brandao, S. J.; Kreppel, M.; Zöller, J.; Fliss, M. D.; Bachar, G.; Shpitzer, T.; Bolzoni, V. A.; Patel, P. R.; Jonnalagadda, S.; Robbins, K. T.; Iyer, N. G.; Skanthakumar, T.; Shah, J. P.; Patel, S. G.; Gil, Z.
Article Title: Prognostic performance of current stage III oral cancer patients after curative intent resection: Evidence to support a revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System
Abstract: Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) represents a heterogeneous group of patients with early local disease with regional metastases (T1N1 and T2N1) and advanced local disease with or without regional metastasis (T3N0 and T3N1). Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic heterogeneity in the stage III category. Methods and Patients: An international retrospective multicenter study of 1815 patients who were treated for OCSCC from 2003 to 2011. Results: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariate models of stage III patients revealed better overall survival (OS; HR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.03–4.15; p = 0.01) and disease-specific survival (DSS; HR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.16–4.12; p = 0.04) rates for patients with T1–2N1/T3N0 disease than for patients with T3N1 disease. The outcomes of patients with T3N1 and stage IVa disease were similar (p = 0.89 and p = 0.78 for OS and DSS, respectively). Modifying stage classification by transferring the T3N1 category to the stage VIa group resulted in a better prognostic performance [Harrell’s concordance index, C index 0.76; Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) 4131.6] compared with the AJCC 7th edition staging system (C index 0.65; AIC 4144.9) for OS. When DSS was assessed, the suggested staging system remained the best performing model (C index 0.71; AIC 1061.3) compared with the current AJCC 7th edition staging (C index 0.64; AIC 1066.2). Conclusions: The prognosis of T3N1 and stage IVa disease are similar in OCSCC, suggesting that these categories could be combined in future revisions of the nodal staging system to enhance prognostic accuracy. © 2015, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; treatment response; aged; major clinical study; overall survival; neck dissection; multimodality cancer therapy; cancer adjuvant therapy; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; cancer staging; outcome assessment; cohort analysis; retrospective study; cetuximab; diagnostic value; multicenter study; sex difference; disease specific survival; chemoradiotherapy; mouth squamous cell carcinoma; cancer prognosis; human; male; female; article
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 22
Issue: Suppl. 3
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2015-12-01
Start Page: 985
End Page: 991
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4842-3
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26314876
PMCID: PMC4941785
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 February 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Snehal G Patel
    412 Patel
  2. Jatin P Shah
    722 Shah