Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition Cancer Staging Manual Journal Article


Authors: Gershenwald, J. E.; Scolyer, R. A.; Hess, K. R.; Sondak, V. K.; Long, G. V.; Ross, M. I.; Lazar, A. J.; Faries, M. B.; Kirkwood, J. M.; McArthur, G. A.; Haydu, L. E.; Eggermont, A. M. M.; Flaherty, K. T.; Balch, C. M.; Thompson, J. F.; for members of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel; the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform
Contributors: Chapman, P. B.; Coit, D. G.; Halpern, A. C.
Article Title: Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition Cancer Staging Manual
Abstract: Answer questions and earn CME/CNE. To update the melanoma staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) a large database was assembled comprising >46,000 patients from 10 centers worldwide with stages I, II, and III melanoma diagnosed since 1998. Based on analyses of this new database, the existing seventh edition AJCC stage IV database, and contemporary clinical trial data, the AJCC Melanoma Expert Panel introduced several important changes to the Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) classification and stage grouping criteria. Key changes in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual include: 1) tumor thickness measurements to be recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm, not 0.01 mm; 2) definitions of T1a and T1b are revised (T1a, <0.8 mm without ulceration; T1b, 0.8-1.0 mm with or without ulceration or <0.8 mm with ulceration), with mitotic rate no longer a T category criterion; 3) pathological (but not clinical) stage IA is revised to include T1b N0 M0 (formerly pathologic stage IB); 4) the N category descriptors “microscopic” and “macroscopic” for regional node metastasis are redefined as “clinically occult” and “clinically apparent”; 5) prognostic stage III groupings are based on N category criteria and T category criteria (ie, primary tumor thickness and ulceration) and increased from 3 to 4 subgroups (stages IIIA-IIID); 6) definitions of N subcategories are revised, with the presence of microsatellites, satellites, or in-transit metastases now categorized as N1c, N2c, or N3c based on the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, if any; 7) descriptors are added to each M1 subcategory designation for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (LDH elevation no longer upstages to M1c); and 8) a new M1d designation is added for central nervous system metastases. This evidence-based revision of the AJCC melanoma staging system will guide patient treatment, provide better prognostic estimates, and refine stratification of patients entering clinical trials. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:472-492. © 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society
Keywords: survival; united states; cancer staging; lymph node metastasis; staging; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; evidence based medicine; melanoma; metastasis; skin neoplasms; tumor volume; practice guideline; pathology; register; registries; societies, medical; lymph node; practice guidelines as topic; medical society; mitosis rate; lactate dehydrogenase; microsatellite marker; cancer classification; lactate dehydrogenase blood level; ulcer; standards; tnm classification; metastatic melanoma; central nervous system metastasis; cancer prognosis; humans; prognosis; human; priority journal; article; american joint committee on cancer (ajcc)
Journal Title: CA - A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume: 67
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0007-9235
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell  
Date Published: 2017-11-01
Start Page: 472
End Page: 492
Language: English
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21409
PUBMED: 29028110
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5978683
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 December 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Allan C Halpern
    396 Halpern
  2. Paul Chapman
    326 Chapman
  3. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit