Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system Journal Article


Authors: Balch, C. M.; Soong, S. J.; Gershenwald, J. E.; Thompson, J. F.; Reintgen, D. S.; Cascinelli, N.; Urist, M.; McMasters, K. M.; Ross, M. I.; Kirkwood, J. M.; Atkins, M. B.; Thompson, J. A.; Coit, D. G.; Byrd, D.; Desmond, R.; Zhang, Y. T.; Liu, P. Y.; Lyman, G. H.; Morabito, A.
Article Title: Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system
Abstract: Purpose: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed major revisions of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) categories and stage groupings for cutaneous melanoma. Thirteen cancer centers and cancer cooperative groups contributed staging and survival data from a total of 30,450 melanoma patients from their databases in order to validate this staging proposal. Patients and Methods: There were 17,600 melanoma patients with complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival rates were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Follow-up survival data for 5 years or longer were available for 73% of the patients. Results: This analysis demonstrated that (1) in the T category, tumor thickness and ulceration were the most powerful predictors of survival, and the level of invasion had a significant impact only within the subgroup of thin (less than or equal to 1 mm) melanomas; (2) in the N category, the following three independent factors were identified: the number of metastatic nodes, whether nodal metastases were clinically occult or clinically apparent, and the presence or absence of primary tumor ulceration; and (3) in the M category, nonvisceral metastases was associated with a better survival compared with visceral metastases. A marked diversity in the natural history of pathologic stage III melanoma was demonstrated by five-fold differences in 5-year survival rates for defined subgroups. This analysis also demonstrated that large and complex data sets could be used effectively to examine prognosis and survival outcome in melanoma patients. Conclusion: The results of this evidence-based methodology were incorporated into the AJCC melanoma staging as described in the companion publication. J Clin Oncol 19:3622-3634. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: analysis; long-term; lymph-node metastases; multivariate-analysis; tumor thickness; thickness; cutaneous malignant-melanoma; multifactorial; breslow; lactate-dehydrogenase; i melanoma; histological features
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 19
Issue: 16
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2001-08-15
Start Page: 3622
End Page: 3634
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000170453500005
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 11504744
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  2. Marshall   Urist
    9 Urist