The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: An initial analysis Journal Article


Authors: Shukla-Dave, A.; Hricak, H.; Kattan, M. W.; Pucar, D.; Kuroiwa, K.; Chen, H. N.; Spector, J.; Koutcher, J. A.; Zakian, K. L.; Scardino, P. T.
Article Title: The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: An initial analysis
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To design new models that combine clinical variables and biopsy data with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) data, and assess their value in predicting the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 220 patients (cT stage T1c or T2a, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score 6) had MRI/MRSI before surgery and met the inclusion criteria for the study. The probability of insignificant cancer was recorded retrospectively and separately for MRI and combined MRI/MRSI on a 0-3 scale (0, definitely insignificant; - 3, definitely significant). Insignificant cancer was defined from surgical pathology as organ-confined cancer of ≤ 0.5 cm3 with no poorly differentiated elements. The accuracy of predicting insignificant prostate cancer was assessed using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), for previously reported clinical models and for newly generated MR models combining clinical variables, and biopsy data with MRI data (MRI model) and MRI/MRSI data (MRI/MRSI model). RESULTS: At pathology, 41% of patients had insignificant cancer; both MRI (AUC 0.803) and MRI/MRSI (AUC 0.854) models incorporating clinical, biopsy and MR data performed significantly better than the basic (AUC 0.574) and more comprehensive medium (AUC 0.726) clinical models. The P values for the differences between the models were: base vs medium model, <0.001; base vs MRI model, <0.001; base vs MRI/MRSI model, <0.001; medium vs MRI model, <0.018; medium vs MRI/MRSI model, <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The new MRI and MRI/MRSI models performed better than the clinical models for predicting the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. After appropriate validation, the new MRI and MRI/MRSI models might help in counselling patients who are considering choosing deferred therapy. © 2007 The Authors.
Keywords: controlled study; aged; middle aged; retrospective studies; major clinical study; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; neoplasm staging; diagnostic accuracy; prostate specific antigen; pathology; retrospective study; prostate cancer; gleason score; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; statistical significance; probability; biopsy, needle; prostate biopsy; predictive value of tests; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; nomogram; patient counseling; mri; roc curve; receiver operating characteristic
Journal Title: BJU International
Volume: 99
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1464-4096
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2007-04-01
Start Page: 786
End Page: 793
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06689.x
PUBMED: 17223922
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 62" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: BJINF" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kentaro Kuroiwa
    28 Kuroiwa
  2. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino
  3. Darko Pucar
    12 Pucar
  4. Hedvig Hricak
    421 Hricak
  5. Amita Dave
    140 Dave
  6. Kristen L Zakian
    82 Zakian
  7. Jason A Koutcher
    278 Koutcher
  8. Hui-Ni Chen
    17 Chen