Imaging low-risk prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Shukla-Dave, A.; Hricak, H.; Scardino, P. T.
Article Title: Imaging low-risk prostate cancer
Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate-specific antigen screening has led to a downstaging of prostate cancer that has resulted in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of the disease. The review discusses the potential role of imaging in identifying low-risk prostate cancer and enabling more appropriate management of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical nomograms have been designed and validated for prediction of the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. The models integrate clinical and biopsy findings. Recently, nomogram models have been designed that incorporate MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging data with clinical and biopsy data for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer; these models performed better than the clinical models. SUMMARY: Clinical nomograms for the prediction of insignificant disease provide more information than any diagnostic test alone; furthermore, nomograms that incorporate MRI or MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging findings with clinical and biopsy data have been shown to improve the prediction of insignificant cancer. A greater level of certainty, however, is still needed to help segregate low-risk patients from intermediate and high-risk patients. Therefore, more research is needed on imaging of low-risk prostate cancer so that data-driven, evidence-based practice guidelines in oncology combining anatomical, metabolic and laboratory data can be designed. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Keywords: review; cancer risk; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; evidence-based medicine; models, biological; risk factors; high risk patient; prostate cancer; gleason score; prostatic neoplasms; evaluation; prostatectomy; prostate biopsy; brachytherapy; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; antiandrogen; nomogram; insignificant; low-risk
Journal Title: Current Opinion in Urology
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0963-0643
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2008-01-01
Start Page: 78
End Page: 86
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f13adc
PUBMED: 18090495
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 7" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: CUOUE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino
  2. Hedvig Hricak
    419 Hricak
  3. Amita Dave
    137 Dave