Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: Results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry Journal Article


Authors: Mazieres, J.; Drilon, A.; Lusque, A.; Mhanna, L.; Cortto, A. B.; Mezquita, L.; Thai, A. A.; Mascaux, C.; Couraud, S.; Veillon, R.; Van den Heuvel, M.; Neal, J.; Peled, N.; Fruh, M.; Ng, T. L.; Gounant, V.; Popat, S.; Diebold, J.; Sabari, J.; Zhu, V. W.; Rothschild, S. I.; Bironzo, P.; Martinez-Marti, A.; Curioni-Fontecedro, A.; Rosell, R.; Lattuca-Truc, M.; Wiesweg, M.; Besse, B.; Solomon, B.; Barlesi, F.; Schouten, R. D.; Wakelee, H.; Camidge, D. R.; Zalcman, G.; Novello, S.; Ou, S. I.; Milia, J.; Gautschi, O.
Article Title: Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: Results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry
Abstract: Background: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The activity of ICI across NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations is poorly characterized. The aim of our study was to address the efficacy of ICI in the context of oncogenic addiction. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study for patients receiving ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with at least one oncogenic driver alteration. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for ICI therapy: best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. The primary end point was PFS under ICI. Secondary end points were best response (RECIST 1.1) and OS from ICI initiation. Results: We studied 551 patients treated in 24 centers from 10 countries. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 271), EGFR (n = 125), BRAF (n = 43), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 29), ALK (n = 23), RET (n = 16), ROS1 (n = 7), and multiple drivers (n = 1). Median age was 60 years, gender ratio was 1 : 1, never/former/current smokers were 28%/51%/21%, respectively, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate by driver alteration was: KRAS = 26%, BRAF = 24%, ROS1 = 17%, MET = 16%, EGFR = 12%, HER2 = 7%, RET = 6%, and ALK = 0%. In the entire cohort, median PFS was 2.8 months, OS 13.3 months, and the best response rate 19%. In a subgroup analysis, median PFS (in months) was 2.1 for EGFR, 3.2 for KRAS, 2.5 for ALK, 3.1 for BRAF, 2.5 for HER2, 2.1 for RET, and 3.4 for MET. In certain subgroups, PFS was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (KRAS, EGFR) and with smoking status (BRAF, HER2). Conclusions: : ICI induced regression in some tumors with actionable driver alterations, but clinical activity was lower compared with the KRAS group and the lack of response in the ALK group was notable. Patients with actionable tumor alterations should receive targeted therapies and chemotherapy before considering immunotherapy as a single agent.
Keywords: chemotherapy; lung cancer; docetaxel; immunotherapy; egfr; therapy; braf; resistance; pd-1; mutations; multicenter; nivolumab; oncogenic addiction
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 30
Issue: 8
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2019-08-01
Start Page: 1321
End Page: 1328
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000493072600017
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz167
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 31125062
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Alexander Edward Drilon
    250 Drilon
  2. Joshua K Sabari
    29 Sabari