Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI Review


Authors: Gollub, M. J.; Lall, C.; Lalwani, N.; Rosenthal, M. H.
Review Title: Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI
Abstract: There has been a rapid increase in the utilization of MRI in rectal cancer staging in the USA essentially replacing endorectal ultrasound and mimicking the trend in Europe seen in the 1990s and 2000s. Accompanying this trend, there is a demand, and recognized need, for greater precision and clarification of confusing, misunderstood and poorly understood concepts, facts, statements and nomenclature regarding rectal cancer and the use of pelvic MRI for diagnosis. As such, this Review, part evidence-based and part expert opinion, will attempt to elucidate and clarify several concepts the authors have encountered in 25 years of imaging rectal cancer, focusing on MRI. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: staging; rectal cancer; restaging; opinion
Journal Title: Abdominal Radiology
Volume: 44
Issue: 11
ISSN: 2366-004X
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2019-11-01
Start Page: 3549
End Page: 3558
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01996-3
PUBMED: 31062058
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7365137
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 December 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marc J Gollub
    208 Gollub