The role of parotid gland irradiation in the development of severe hyposalivation (xerostomia) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Temporal patterns, risk factors, and testing the QUANTEC guidelines Journal Article


Authors: Owosho, A. A.; Thor, M.; Oh, J. H.; Riaz, N.; Tsai, C. J.; Rosenberg, H.; Varthis, S.; Yom, S. H. K.; Huryn, J. M.; Lee, N. Y.; Deasy, J. O.; Estilo, C. L.
Article Title: The role of parotid gland irradiation in the development of severe hyposalivation (xerostomia) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Temporal patterns, risk factors, and testing the QUANTEC guidelines
Abstract: Background: The aims of this study were to investigate temporal patterns and potential risk factors for severe hyposalivation (xerostomia) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), and to test the two QUANTEC (Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) guidelines. Patients and methods: Sixty-three patients treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2006 and 2015, who had a minimum of three stimulated whole mouth saliva flow measurements (WMSFM) at a median follow-up time of 11 (range: 3-24) months were included. Xerostomia was defined as WMSFM <= 25% compared to relative pre-radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into three follow-up groups: 1: <6 months; 2: 6-11 months; and 3: 12-24 months. Potential risk factors were investigated (Mann Whitney U test), and relative risks (RRs) assessed for the two QUANTEC guidelines. Results: The incidence of xerostomia was 27%, 14% and 17% at follow-up time points 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At <6 months, the mean dose to the contralateral and the ipsilateral parotid glands (Dmean(contra), Dmean(ipsi)) was higher among patients with xerostomia (Dmeancontra: 25 Gy vs. 15 Gy; Dmeanipsi: 44 Gy vs. 25 Gy). Patients with xerostomia had higher pre-RT WMSFM (3.5 g vs. 2.4 g), and had been treated more frequently with additional chemotherapy (93% vs. 63%; all 4 variables: p < 0.05). At 6-11 months, Dmeancontra among patients with xerostomia was higher compared to patients without (26 Gy vs. 20 Gy). The RR as specified by the one- and two-gland QUANTEC guideline was 2.3 and 1.4 for patients with <6 months follow-up time, and 2.0 and 1.2 for patients with longer follow-up (6-11 + 6 24 months). Conclusion: Xerostomia following IMRT peaks within six months post-radiotherapy and fades with time. Limiting the mean dose to both parotid glands (ipsilateral <25 Gy, contralateral <25 Gy) and reducing the use of chemotherapy will likely decrease the rate of xerostomia. Both QUANTEC guidelines are effective in preventing xerostomia. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: radiotherapy; head and neck cancer; imrt; carcinoma; xerostomia; volume; management; quality-of-life; recovery; criteria; quantec; salivary function; constraints; severe hyposalivation; hypofunction
Journal Title: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume: 45
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1010-5182
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-04-01
Start Page: 595
End Page: 600
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000399850300022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.020
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 28256385
PMCID: PMC6619497
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joseph M Huryn
    108 Huryn
  2. Cherry Estilo
    93 Estilo
  3. Nadeem Riaz
    415 Riaz
  4. Nancy Y. Lee
    871 Lee
  5. Jung Hun Oh
    187 Oh
  6. Joseph Owen Deasy
    524 Deasy
  7. SaeHee Kim Yom
    42 Yom
  8. Maria Elisabeth Thor
    148 Thor
  9. Chiaojung Jillian   Tsai
    238 Tsai
  10. Adepitan Adedamola Owosho
    29 Owosho