Internal and external generalizability of temporal dose-response relationships for xerostomia following IMRT for head and neck cancer Journal Article


Authors: Thor, M.; Owosho, A. A.; Clark, H. D.; Oh, J. H.; Riaz, N.; Hovan, A.; Tsai, J.; Thomas, S. D.; Yom, S. H. K.; Wu, J. S.; Huryn, J. M.; Moiseenko, V.; Lee, N. Y.; Estilo, C. L.; Deasy, J. O.
Article Title: Internal and external generalizability of temporal dose-response relationships for xerostomia following IMRT for head and neck cancer
Abstract: Background and purpose To study internal and external generalizability of temporal dose–response relationships for xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer, and to investigate potential amendments of the QUANTEC guidelines. Material and methods Objective xerostomia was assessed in 121 patients (nCohort1 = 55; nCohort2 = 66) treated to 70 Gy@2 Gy in 2006–2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses (UVA, MVA with 1000 bootstrap populations) were conducted in Cohort1, and generalizability of the best-performing MVA model was investigated in Cohort2 (performance: AUC, p-values, and Hosmer–Lemeshow p-values (pHL)). Ultimately and for clinical guidance, minimum mean dose thresholds to the contralateral and the ipsilateral parotid glands (Dmeancontra, Dmeanipsi) were estimated from the generated dose–response curves. Results The observed xerostomia rate was 38%/47% (3 months) and 19%/23% (11–12 months) in Cohort1/Cohort2. Risk of xerostomia at 3 months increased for higher Dmeancontra and Dmeanipsi (Cohort1: 0.17·Dmeancontra + 0.11·Dmeanipsi-8.13; AUC = 0.90 ± 0.05; p = 0.0002 ± 0.002; pHL = 0.22 ± 0.23; Cohort2: AUC = 0.81; p < 0.0001; pHL = 0.27). The identified minimum Dmeancontra thresholds were lower than in the QUANTEC guidelines (Cohort1/Cohort2: Dmeancontra = 12/19 Gy; Dmeancontra, Dmeanipsi = 16, 25/20, 26 Gy). Conclusions Increased Dmeancontra and Dmeanipsi explain short-term xerostomia following IMRT. Our results also suggest decreasing Dmeancontra to below 20 Gy, while keeping Dmeanipsi to around 25 Gy. Long-term xerostomia was less frequent, and no dose–response relationship was established for this follow-up time. © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Keywords: dose response; radiotherapy; imrt; xerostomia; head and neck; quantec
Journal Title: Radiotherapy and Oncology
Volume: 122
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0167-8140
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-02-01
Start Page: 200
End Page: 206
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.005
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5319906
PUBMED: 27890427
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 March 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joseph M Huryn
    108 Huryn
  2. Cherry Estilo
    93 Estilo
  3. Nadeem Riaz
    415 Riaz
  4. Nancy Y. Lee
    871 Lee
  5. Jung Hun Oh
    187 Oh
  6. Joseph Owen Deasy
    524 Deasy
  7. SaeHee Kim Yom
    42 Yom
  8. Maria Elisabeth Thor
    148 Thor
  9. Chiaojung Jillian   Tsai
    238 Tsai
  10. Adepitan Adedamola Owosho
    29 Owosho