Erlotinib and the risk of oral cancer: The Erlotinib Prevention of Oral Cancer (EPOC) randomized clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: William, W. N. Jr; Papadimitrakopoulou, V.; Lee, J. J.; Mao, L.; Cohen, E. E. W.; Lin, H. Y.; Gillenwater, A. M.; Martin, J. W.; Lingen, M. W.; Boyle, J. O.; Shin, D. M.; Vigneswaran, N.; Shinn, N.; Heymach, J. V.; Wistuba, I. I.; Tang, X.; Kim, E. S.; Saintigny, P.; Blair, E. A.; Meiller, T.; Gutkind, J. S.; Myers, J.; El-Naggar, A.; Lippman, S. M.
Article Title: Erlotinib and the risk of oral cancer: The Erlotinib Prevention of Oral Cancer (EPOC) randomized clinical trial
Abstract: IMPORTANCE: Standard molecularly based strategies to predict and/or prevent oral cancer development in patients with oral premalignant lesions (OPLs) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To test if the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib would reduce oral cancer development in patients with high-risk OPLs defined by specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) profiles. Secondary objectives included prospective determination of LOH as a prognostic marker in OPLs. DESIGN:The Erlotinib Prevention of Oral Cancer (EPOC) study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-bind trial. Accrual occurred from November 2006 through July 2012, with a median follow-up time of 35 months in an ambulatory care setting in 5 US academic referral institutions. Patients with OPLs were enrolled in the protocol, and each underwent LOH profiling (N = 379); they were classified as high-risk (LOH-positive) or low-risk (LOH-negative) patients based on their LOH profiles and oral cancer history. The randomized sample consisted of 150 LOH-positive patients. INTERVENTIONS: Oral erlotinib treatment (150 mg/d) or placebo for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Oral cancer-free survival (CFS). RESULTS: A total of 395 participants were classified with LOH profiles, and 254 were classified LOH positive. Of these, 150 (59%) were randomized, 75 each to the placebo and erlotinib groups. The 3-year CFS rates in placebo- and erlotinib-treated patients were 74% and 70%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.68-2.38; P =.45). The 3-year CFS was significantly lower for LOH-positive compared with LOH-negative groups (74% vs 87%, HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.25-3.83; P =.01). Increased EGFR gene copy number correlated with LOH-positive status (P <.001) and lower CFS (P=.01). The EGFR gene copy number was not predictive of erlotinib efficacy. Erlotinib-induced skin rash was associated with improved CFS (P=.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this trial, LOH was validated as a marker of oral cancer risk and found to be associated with increased EGFR copy number (the target of the intervention). Erlotinib did not, however, improve CFS in high-risk patients with LOH-positive or high-EGFR-gene-copy-number OPLs. These results support incorporation of LOH testing as a prognostic tool in routine clinical practice but do not support erlotinib use in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00402779.
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 2
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2016-02-01
Start Page: 209
End Page: 216
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4364
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4771491
PUBMED: 26540028
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 October 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jay O Boyle
    148 Boyle