FDG-PET in esophageal cancer: Incremental value over computed tomography Journal Article


Authors: Yeung, H. W. D.; Macapinlac, H. A.; Mazumdar, M.; Bains, M.; Finn, R. D.; Larson, S. M.
Article Title: FDG-PET in esophageal cancer: Incremental value over computed tomography
Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with cancer (CA) of the esophagus, and its incremental value over computed tomography (CT) scan. Methods: Positron emission tomography (PET) scan and CT scan reports of all patients with biopsyproven CA esophagus from December 1995 to August 1998 were reviewed. PET images were acquired on a high-resolution dedicated PET scanner 45 minutes to 1 hour after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG). Emission images of the neck, chest, and abdomen were obtained, followed by transmission scans at selected sites. Results: One hundred fifty-one scans were performed on 109 patients. The clinical indications were staging (67), follow-up evaluation after chemoradiation (66), and evaluation of possible recurrence after surgery (18). A final diagnosis was reached in 99 patients at 276 sites by histology (91.3%) or clinical follow-up of over 6 months (8.7%). FDG-PET scan showed a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 95%, and accuracy of 86% compared with 68%, 81%, and 73% for CT. Of the 32 false negatives, 23 were perigastric or paraesophageal lymph nodes close to the primary, and 5 were peritoneal or pleural spread. PET detected 99% of the primary lesion (66 out of 67) with a mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of 11 (3.6 to 46). There was no apparent difference in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake between squamous cell CA (N = 15, mean SUV 10.5), adenoCA (N = 48, mean SUV 11.2), and other cell types (N = 3, mean SUV 10.3). The one case where PET missed the primary lesion turned out to have a lesion measuring 0.4 cm in its maximum diameter. In 20 patients out of the 99 with confirmed diagnosis (20%), PET detected 24 confirmed lesions not seen on CT, and in 14 patients (14%) management was changed as a result of the PET finding. Conclusion: FDG-PET scan is more accurate than CT (86% vs. 73%; P = 0.0002) in the evaluation of patients with CA esophagus. It provides additional information over CT, impacting on management in 14% of patients. Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: positron emission tomography; esophageal cancer; f-18 fdg
Journal Title: Clinical Positron Imaging
Volume: 2
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1095-0397
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 1999-09-01
Start Page: 255
End Page: 260
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s1095-0397(99)00035-7
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 14516649
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 16 August 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Madhu Mazumdar
    127 Mazumdar
  2. Henry W D Yeung
    126 Yeung
  3. Ronald D Finn
    279 Finn
  4. Steven M Larson
    958 Larson
  5. Manjit S Bains
    338 Bains