Comparison of perioperative radiation therapy and surgery versus surgery alone in 204 patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A retrospective 2-institution study Journal Article


Authors: Kelly, K. J.; Yoon, S. S.; Kuk, D.; Qin, L. X.; Dukleska, K.; Chang, K. K.; Chen, Y. L.; Delaney, T. F.; Brennan, M. F.; Singer, S.
Article Title: Comparison of perioperative radiation therapy and surgery versus surgery alone in 204 patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A retrospective 2-institution study
Abstract: Objective: To compare outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma treated with perioperative radiation therapy (RT) versus those treated without perioperative RT. Background: RT for retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma is controversial, and few studies have compared outcomes with and without RT. Methods: Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed to retrospectively compare patients with primary retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma treated during 2003-2011. Multivariate Cox regression modelswere used to assess associations with the primary endpoints: local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival. Results: At 1 institution, 172 patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas at another institution 32 patients were treated with surgery and perioperative proton beam RT or intensity-modulated RT with or without intraoperative RT. The groups were similar in age, tumor size, grade, and margin status (all P > 0.08). The RT group had a higher percentage of pelvic tumors (P = 0.03) and a different distribution of histologies (P = 0.04). Perioperative morbidity was higher in the RT group (44% vs 16% of patients; P = 0.004). After a median follow-up of 39 months, 5-year LRFS was 91% (95% confidence interval, 79%-100%) in the RT group and 65% (57%-74%) in the surgery-only group (P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, RT was associated with better LRFS (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = 0.03). Five-year disease-specific survival was 93% (95% confidence interval, 82%-100%) in the RT group and 85% (78%-92%) in the surgery-only group (P = 0.3). Conclusions: The addition of advanced-modality RT to surgery for primary retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma was associated with improved LRFS, although this did not translate into significantly better disease-specific survival. This treatment strategy warrants further investigation in a randomized trial. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; middle aged; cancer surgery; primary tumor; major clinical study; bevacizumab; doxorubicin; cancer adjuvant therapy; outcome assessment; cancer grading; tumor volume; morbidity; distant metastasis; ifosfamide; postoperative complication; length of stay; multicenter study; operation duration; urinary tract infection; pelvis tumor; age distribution; external beam radiotherapy; leiomyosarcoma; inferior cava vein; postoperative hemorrhage; surgical anatomy; disease specific survival; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; proton radiation; liposarcoma; recurrence free survival; comparative effectiveness; preoperative radiotherapy; dedifferentiated liposarcoma; local recurrence free survival; well differentiated liposarcoma; retroperitoneal sarcoma; image guided biopsy; operative blood loss; human; male; female; priority journal; article; electron beam radiation therapy; neoadjuvant radiation therapy; proton beam radiation therapy; retropertioneal sarcoma
Journal Title: Annals of Surgery
Volume: 262
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0003-4932
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2015-07-01
Start Page: 156
End Page: 162
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001063
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4465112
PUBMED: 26061213
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 15 April 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sam Yoon
    108 Yoon
  2. Murray F Brennan
    1059 Brennan
  3. Kaitlyn J Kelly
    31 Kelly
  4. Li-Xuan Qin
    192 Qin
  5. Samuel Singer
    337 Singer
  6. Deborah Kuk
    87 Kuk