Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: A multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods Journal Article


Authors: Macadam, S. A.; Zhong, T.; Weichman, K.; Papsdorf, M.; Lennox, P. A.; Hazen, A.; Matros, E.; Disa, J.; Mehrara, B.; Pusic, A. L.
Article Title: Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: A multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods
Abstract: Background: Approximately 20 percent of women select autologous tissue for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and most commonly choose the abdomen as the donor site. An increasing proportion of women are seeking muscle-sparing procedures, but the benefit remains controversial. It is therefore important to determine whether better outcomes are associated with these techniques, thereby justifying longer operative times and increased costs. Methods: Patients from five North American centers were eligible if they underwent reconstruction by means of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, muscle-sparing free transverse abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, free TRAM flap, or the pedicled TRAM flap. Patients were sent the BREAST-Q. Demographics and complications were collected. Results: The authors analyzed 1790 charts representing 670 DIEP, 293 muscle-sparing free TRAM, 683 pedicled TRAM, and 144 free TRAM patients with an average follow-up of 5.5 years. Flap loss did not differ by flap type. Partial flap loss was higher in pedicled TRAM compared with DIEP (p = 0.002). Fat necrosis was higher in pedicled TRAM compared with DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM (p < 0.001). Hernia/bulge was highest in pedicled TRAM (p < 0.001). Physical well-being (abdomen) scores were higher in DIEP compared with pedicled TRAM controlling for confounders. Conclusions: Complications and patient-reported outcomes differ when comparing abdominally based breast reconstruction techniques. The results of this study show that the DIEP flap was associated with the highest abdominal well-being and the lowest abdominal morbidity compared with the pedicled TRAM flap, but did not differ from muscle-sparing free TRAM and free TRAM flaps. Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Journal Title: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume: 137
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0032-1052
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2016-03-01
Start Page: 758
End Page: 771
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479932.11170.8f
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26910656
PMCID: PMC5064829
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 April 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joseph Disa
    262 Disa
  2. Andrea Pusic
    300 Pusic
  3. Babak Mehrara
    448 Mehrara
  4. Evan Matros
    202 Matros