Complications and patient-reported outcomes after abdominally based breast reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study Journal Article


Authors: Erdmann-Sager, J.; Wilkins, E. G.; Pusic, A. L.; Qi, J.; Hamill, J. B.; Kim, H. M.; Guldbrandsen, G. E.; Chun, Y. S.
Article Title: Complications and patient-reported outcomes after abdominally based breast reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Abdominal flap reconstruction is the most popular form of autologous breast reconstruction. The current study compared complications and patient-reported outcomes after pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. METHODS: Patients undergoing abdominally based breast reconstruction at 11 centers were prospectively evaluated for abdominal donor-site and breast complications. Patient-reported outcomes were measured by the BREAST-Q and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys. Mixed-effects regression models were used to assess the effects of procedure type on outcomes. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty patients had 1-year follow-up and 587 had 2-year follow-up. Two years after reconstruction, SIEA compared with DIEP flaps were associated with a higher rate of donor-site complications (OR, 2.7; p = 0.001); however, SIEA flaps were associated with higher BREAST-Q abdominal physical well-being scores compared with DIEP flaps at 1 year (mean difference, 4.72, on a scale from 0 to 100; p = 0.053). This difference was not significant at 2 years. Abdominal physical well-being scores at 2 years postoperatively were lower in the pedicled TRAM flap group by 7.2 points (p = 0.006) compared with DIEP flaps and by 7.8 points (p = 0.03) compared with SIEA flaps, and in the free TRAM flap group, scores were lower by 4.9 points (p = 0.04) compared with DIEP flaps. Bilateral reconstruction had significantly lower abdominal physical well-being scores compared with unilateral reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Although all abdominally based flaps are viable breast reconstruction options, DIEP and SIEA flaps are associated with higher abdominal physical well-being than pedicled and free TRAM flaps. Although SIEA flaps offer the advantage of not violating the fascia, higher rates of donor-site complications may diminish patient satisfaction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; middle aged; patient satisfaction; perforator flap; comparative study; follow up; follow-up studies; mastectomy; breast neoplasms; breast reconstruction; transplantation; vascularization; mammaplasty; postoperative complication; postoperative complications; breast tumor; patient reported outcome measures; myocutaneous flap; rectus abdominis; rectus abdominis muscle; organ donor; patient-reported outcome; procedures; epigastric artery; epigastric arteries; humans; human; female; transplant donor site; fasciotomy
Journal Title: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume: 141
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0032-1052
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2018-02-01
Start Page: 271
End Page: 281
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004016
PUBMED: 29019862
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5785552
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 August 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrea Pusic
    300 Pusic