Recommendations for a step-wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Young, G. P.; Senore, C.; Mandel, J. S.; Allison, J. E.; Atkin, W. S.; Benamouzig, R.; Bossuyt, P. M. M.; De Silva, M.; Guittet, L.; Halloran, S. P.; Haug, U.; Hoff, G.; Itzkowitz, S. H.; Leja, M.; Levin, B.; Meijer, G. A.; O'Morain, C. A.; Parry, S.; Rabeneck, L.; Rozen, P.; Saito, H.; Schoen, R. E.; Seaman, H. E.; Steele, R. J. C.; Sung, J. J. Y.; Winawer, S. J.
Article Title: Recommendations for a step-wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer
Abstract: BACKGROUND New screening tests for colorectal cancer continue to emerge, but the evidence needed to justify their adoption in screening programs remains uncertain. METHODS A review of the literature and a consensus approach by experts was undertaken to provide practical guidance on how to compare new screening tests with proven screening tests. RESULTS Findings and recommendations from the review included the following: Adoption of a new screening test requires evidence of effectiveness relative to a proven comparator test. Clinical accuracy supported by programmatic population evaluation in the screening context on an intention-to-screen basis, including acceptability, is essential. Cancer-specific mortality is not essential as an endpoint provided that the mortality benefit of the comparator has been demonstrated and that the biologic basis of detection is similar. Effectiveness of the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test provides the minimum standard to be achieved by a new test. A 4-phase evaluation is recommended. An initial retrospective evaluation in cancer cases and controls (Phase 1) is followed by a prospective evaluation of performance across the continuum of neoplastic lesions (Phase 2). Phase 3 follows the demonstration of adequate accuracy in these 2 prescreening phases and addresses programmatic outcomes at 1 screening round on an intention-to-screen basis. Phase 4 involves more comprehensive evaluation of ongoing screening over multiple rounds. Key information is provided from the following parameters: the test positivity rate in a screening population, the true-positive and false-positive rates, and the number needed to colonoscope to detect a target lesion. CONCLUSIONS New screening tests can be evaluated efficiently by this stepwise comparative approach. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; colonoscopy; screening test; molecular diagnostics; fecal occult blood test
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 122
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2016-03-15
Start Page: 826
End Page: 839
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29865
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26828588
PMCID: PMC5066737
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 4 April 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sidney J Winawer
    274 Winawer