Utility of routine PET imaging to predict response and survival after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer Journal Article


Authors: Barnett, S. A.; Downey, R. J.; Zheng, J.; Plourde, G.; Shen, R.; Chaft, J.; Akhurst, T.; Park, B. J.; Rusch, V. W.
Article Title: Utility of routine PET imaging to predict response and survival after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract: Background Data from clinical trials suggest that changes in the glucose avidity of the primary site of lung cancer during induction therapy, measured by changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, correlate with tumor response. Little information about the utility of changes in positron emission tomography imaging of involved lymph nodes during induction chemotherapy is available. The utility of positron emission tomography imaging of either the primary site or nodal metastases, obtained during routine clinical care outside of a clinical trial setting, to predict response has also not been examined. Methods A retrospective review of all surgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer at a single institution imaged between 2000 and 2006 with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography before or after induction therapy was performed. Results An increase in standardized uptake value in the primary site of disease during induction therapy was associated with reduced overall survival after resection. Neither pretreatment standardized uptake value nor percentage change in the primary site was associated with overall survival after resection. A decrease in standardized uptake value of greater than 60% in the involved N2 mediastinal nodes was the best predictor of overall survival, better than changes seen in the primary site of disease. Conclusions An increase in glucose avidity of non-small cell lung cancers during induction therapy was associated with a worse prognosis compared with stable or any decrease in standardized uptake value. Changes in the glucose avidity of mediastinal nodal metastases may be a stronger predictor of survival than changes in the primary site of disease. © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Journal Title: Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume: 101
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0003-4975
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2016-03-01
Start Page: 1052
End Page: 1059
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.099
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26794896
PMCID: PMC4837652
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 April 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Junting Zheng
    200 Zheng
  2. Valerie W Rusch
    864 Rusch
  3. Ronglai Shen
    204 Shen
  4. Jamie Erin Chaft
    289 Chaft
  5. Bernard J Park
    263 Park
  6. Timothy J Akhurst
    139 Akhurst
  7. Robert J Downey
    254 Downey