Prospective validation of pooled prognostic factors in women with advanced cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab: NRG Oncology/GOG study Journal Article


Authors: Tewari, K. S.; Sill, M. W.; Monk, B. J.; Penson, R. T.; Long, H. J. 3rd; Poveda, A.; Landrum, L. M.; Leitao, M. M.; Brown, J.; Reid, T. J. A.; Michael, H. E.; Moore, D. H.
Article Title: Prospective validation of pooled prognostic factors in women with advanced cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab: NRG Oncology/GOG study
Abstract: Purpose: In the randomized phase III trial, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 240, the incorporation of bevacizumab with chemotherapy significantly increased overall survival (OS) in women with advanced cervical cancer. A major objective of GOG-240 was to prospectively analyze previously identified pooled clinical prognostic factors known as the Moore criteria. Experimental Design: Potential negative factors included black race, performance status 1, pelvic disease, prior cisplatin, and progression-free interval <365 days. Risk categories included low-risk (0-1 factor), mid-risk (2-3 factors), and high-risk (4-5 factors). Each test of association was conducted at the 5% level of significance. Logistic regression and survival analysis was used to determine whether factors were prognostic or could be used to guide therapy. Results: For the entire population (n = 452), high-risk patients had significantly worse OS (P < 0.0001). The HRs of death for treating with topotecan in low-risk, mid-risk, and high-risk subsets are 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-2.24], 1.11 (95% CI, 0.82-1.5), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.50-1.42), respectively. The HRs of death for treating with bevacizumab in low-risk, mid-risk, and high-risk subsets are 0.96 (95% CI, 0.51-1.83; P = 0.9087), 0.673 (95% CI, 0.5-0.91; P = 0.0094), and 0.536 (95% CI, 0.32-0.905; P = 0.0196), respectively. Conclusions: This is the first prospectively validated scoring system in cervical cancer. The Moore criteria have real-world clinical applicability. Toxicity concerns may justify omission of bevacizumab in some low-risk patients where survival benefit is small. The benefit to receiving bevacizumab appears to be greatest in the moderate- and high-risk subgroups (5.8-month increase in median OS). © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 21
Issue: 24
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2015-12-15
Start Page: 5480
End Page: 5487
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1346
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26672085
PMCID: PMC4896296
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 February 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mario Leitao
    575 Leitao