Improving patient prostate cancer risk assessment: Moving from static, globally-applied to dynamic, practice-specific risk calculators Journal Article


Authors: Strobl, A. N.; Vickers, A. J.; van Calster, B.; Steyerberg, E.; Leach, R. J.; Thompson, I. M.; Ankerst, D. P.
Article Title: Improving patient prostate cancer risk assessment: Moving from static, globally-applied to dynamic, practice-specific risk calculators
Abstract: Clinical risk calculators are now widely available but have generally been implemented in a static and one-size-fits-all fashion. The objective of this study was to challenge these notions and show via a case study concerning risk-based screening for prostate cancer how calculators can be dynamically and locally tailored to improve on-site patient accuracy. Yearly data from five international prostate biopsy cohorts (3 in the US, 1 in Austria, 1 in England) were used to compare 6 methods for annual risk prediction: static use of the online US-developed Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC); recalibration of the PCPTRC; revision of the PCPTRC; building a new model each year using logistic regression, Bayesian prior-to-posterior updating, or random forests. All methods performed similarly with respect to discrimination, except for random forests, which were worse. All methods except for random forests greatly improved calibration over the static PCPTRC in all cohorts except for Austria, where the PCPTRC had the best calibration followed closely by recalibration. The case study shows that a simple annual recalibration of a general online risk tool for prostate cancer can improve its accuracy with respect to the local patient practice at hand. © 2015 Elsevier Inc..
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; major clinical study; cancer risk; accuracy; bayes theorem; calibration; prediction; risk assessment; prostate cancer; statistical analysis; prostate biopsy; urology; forecasting; intermethod comparison; regression analysis; logistic regression analysis; decision trees; prostate cancers; diseases; case study; logistic regression; online system; revision; calculator; discrimination; logistic regressions; human; male; priority journal; article; social networking (online); random forest; mathematical instruments; bayesian priors; concerning risk; risk predictions; prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator
Journal Title: Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume: 56
ISSN: 1532-0464
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2015-08-01
Start Page: 87
End Page: 93
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.001
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4532612
PUBMED: 25989018
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 September 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    882 Vickers