Is management of the positive sentinel node different in elderly patients with breast cancer? Meeting Abstract


Authors: Boolbol, S. K.; Fey, J. V.; Rizza, C. M. ; Bernik, S. F.; Sacchini, V.; Borgen, P. I.; Van Zee, K. J.; Cody, H. S. 3rd; Gemignani, M. L.
Abstract Title: Is management of the positive sentinel node different in elderly patients with breast cancer?
Meeting Title: 24th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS)
Abstract: Introduction: This study was undertaken to determine whether management of patients with positive sentinel nodes was affected by age at diagnosis. Methods: From July 1997 to February 2001. 2441 patients <70 years of age and 492 patients 70 years or older with clinically node-negative breast cancer underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy utilizing both blue dye and technetium-99m sulfur colloid. Each sentinel lymph node (SLN) underwent enhanced pathology by serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry. Results: The SLN was positive in 825 patients; of these. 281 were detected by enhanced pathology alone. In a comparison of the age groups ≥70 years and <70, the SLN was found less often by blue dye (81% vs. 84%, p=0.05) and by isotope (89% vs. 92%, p = 0.03) in patients 270 years, but overall (dye and/or isotope) success was comparable for the two groups (97% vs. 98%, p=NS). Completion ALND in patients with positive SLN Age Group SLN + ALND done Enhanced path+ SLN+ ALND done/ Enhanced path+ <70 714/2441 (29%) 633/714 (88%) 243/714 (34%) 175/243 (72%) ≥70 111/492(23%) 85/111 (77%) 38/111 (34%) 17/38 (45%) p-value 0.002 0.001 NS 0.001 Conclusion: The SLNB procedure is equally successful in patients 70 years or older and those less than 70; however, in elderly patients (≥70). the positive sentinel node is less likely to be managed with a completion ALND, regardless of the method of detection.
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 69
Issue: 3
Meeting Dates: 2001 Dec 10-13
Meeting Location: San Antonio, TX
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2001-10-01
Start Page: 218
Language: English
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 11762328
DOI: 10.1023/A:1017475415273
DOI/URL:
Notes: Meeting Abstract: 105 -- Export Date: 21 May 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kimberly J Van Zee
    293 Van Zee
  2. Hiram S Cody III
    242 Cody
  3. Mary L Gemignani
    218 Gemignani
  4. Stephanie F Bernik
    6 Bernik
  5. Virgilio Sacchini
    147 Sacchini
  6. Patrick I Borgen
    253 Borgen
  7. Jane Fey
    66 Fey
  8. Christine M Nippes
    2 Nippes