Elective neck dissection in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: An international collaborative study Journal Article


Authors: Amit, M.; Na’ara, S.; Sharma, K.; Ramer, N.; Ramer, I.; Agbetoba, A.; Glick, J.; Yang, X.; Lei, D.; Bjoerndal, K.; Godballe, C.; Mücke, T.; Klaus-Dietrich, W.; Eckardt, A. M.; Copelli, C.; Sesenna, E.; Palmer, F.; Ganly, I.; Gil, Z.
Article Title: Elective neck dissection in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: An international collaborative study
Abstract: Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) accounts for 3–5 % of all head and neck malignancies. Investigations of outcomes from elective neck dissection (END) for patients with ACC are sparse. This study aimed to assess the impact of END on the survival of patients with ACC. Methods: This retrospective multicentered study investigated 270 patients who underwent neck dissection. A multivariate analysis assessed associations of clinical and histopathologic characteristics with survival outcomes. Results: The primary tumor sites included the oral cavity in 250 patients (55 %), the major salivary glands in 133 patients (29 %), the sinonasal mucosa in 68 patients (15 %), and the larynx in six patients (1 %). The overall rate of occult nodal metastases among the patients who underwent END was 17 % (38/226). The highest incidence of occult nodal metastases was with the oral cavity (66 %). The 5-year overall survival (72 and 79 % for patients with or without END, respectively) and disease-specific survival (74 and 81 % for patients with or without END, respectively) were similar in the two groups. The subgroup analysis of patients according to the primary site showed no significant impact of END on outcome. In the multivariate analysis, primary site, T classification, and N classification were the only variables associated with outcome. Conclusions: The incidence of occult neck metastases among patients with ACC is 17 %. The highest incidence of occult metastases is with the oral cavity. Statistical analysis showed no survival advantage for patients who underwent END compared with those who did not. © 2014, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 22
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2015-04-01
Start Page: 1353
End Page: 1359
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4106-7
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 25249259
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 4 May 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ian Ganly
    430 Ganly
  2. Frank Palmer
    82 Palmer