Improved outcomes in patients with osteogenic sarcoma of the head and neck Journal Article


Authors: Patel, S. G.; Meyers, P.; Huvos, A. G.; Wolden, S.; Singh, B.; Shaha, A. R.; Boyle, J. O.; Pfister, D.; Shah, J. P.; Kraus, D. H.
Article Title: Improved outcomes in patients with osteogenic sarcoma of the head and neck
Abstract: BACKGROUND. The current study reviews the authors' recent institutional experience in the treatment of osteosarcoma of the head and neck (OSHN). METHODS. The clinical records of 44 patients who were treated between 1981 and 1998 for OSHN were reviewed retrospectively. Archived histologic material was reviewed and data were analyzed to identify factors predictive of disease control and survival. Outcomes were compared with a previously reported historic cohort treated at the study institution. RESULTS. Patients ranged in age from 6 to 64 years (median, 31 years). The mandible was the primary site in 18 patients (41%), the maxilla in 20 patients (45%), and the skull in 6 patients (14%). Surgery was employed in all 44 patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 30 patients (68%), and postoperative radiation therapy was given to 7 patients (16%). The surgical excision margins were positive in 13 patients (30%). High-grade lesions were reported in 50% patients and low-grade lesions were noted in 18% of patients (grade was not assessable in 32%). Histologic response was "unfavorable" in 22 of 30 patients (73%) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 3-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were approximately 81%, 81%, and 73%, respectively (median follow-up of 41 months). Positive surgical margins were found to be the only significant predictor of worse disease-specific survival. Compared with the historical cohort, the current experience demonstrated an obvious improvement in the 5-year local control (35% vs. 78%), distant metastases (37% vs. 13%), and overall survival (23% vs. 70%). CONCLUSIONS. Negative surgical margins were found to be the only significant predictor of overall and disease-specific survival. The results of the current study represent a considerable improvement over the authors' previously published experience and compare favorably with the results reported in the literature. © 2002 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: osteosarcoma; survival; adolescent; adult; cancer survival; child; treatment outcome; disease-free survival; middle aged; survival rate; retrospective studies; cancer recurrence; cancer adjuvant therapy; chemotherapy, adjuvant; neoadjuvant therapy; radiotherapy, adjuvant; antineoplastic agent; metastasis; neoplasm recurrence, local; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; cohort analysis; recurrence; retrospective study; head and neck cancer; head and neck neoplasms; surgery; outcomes research; multivariate analysis; sex difference; drug therapy; mandible; humans; human; male; female; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 95
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2002-10-01
Start Page: 1495
End Page: 1503
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10849
PUBMED: 12237918
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 14 November 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Dennis Kraus
    268 Kraus
  2. Ashok R Shaha
    697 Shaha
  3. Jay O Boyle
    148 Boyle
  4. Bhuvanesh Singh
    242 Singh
  5. Suzanne L Wolden
    560 Wolden
  6. Snehal G Patel
    412 Patel
  7. David G Pfister
    389 Pfister
  8. Jatin P Shah
    721 Shah
  9. Paul Meyers
    311 Meyers
  10. Andrew G Huvos
    289 Huvos