Rapid antibiotic delivery and appropriate antibiotic selection reduce length of hospital stay of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Link between quality of care and resource utilization Journal Article


Authors: Battleman, D. S.; Callahan, M.; Thaler, H. T.
Article Title: Rapid antibiotic delivery and appropriate antibiotic selection reduce length of hospital stay of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Link between quality of care and resource utilization
Abstract: Objectives: To measure quality-of-care variables relevant to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and to determine their relative contribution to variation in length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: One hundred cases of pneumonia requiring hospitalization from each of 7 institutions (2 community and 5 university teaching hospitals) were randomly selected (total sample, 700 cases). Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted using a standardized data instrument. Three quality-of-care measures were analyzed: (1) site of initial antibiotic treatment (emergency department vs floor), (2) door-to-needle time, and (3) appropriateness of antibiotic selection. Appropriate antibiotic selection was defined by the 1998 Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for the treatment of hospitalized pneumonia cases. Regression modeling was used to determine associations between LOS and our quality-of-care (process) variables. Results: The mean ± SD LOS for this sample was 7.0 ± 4.1 days. Prolonged LOS, defined as greater than or equal to the 75th percentile of the LOS distribution, was the dependent variable in our regression analysis and was greater than or equal to 9.0 days. After clinical and demographic variables were adjusted for, logistic regression modeling revealed that all 3 quality-of-care measures were associated with prolonged LOS: (1) initial antibiotic treatment in the emergency department (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.48); (2) appropriate antibiotic selection (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88); and (3) door-to-needle time (OR, 1.75 per 8 hours; 95% CI, 1.34-2.29). In a secondary analysis, we examined the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients who were treated more rapidly in the emergency department compared with those who were treated on the inpatient floor. No clinically meaningful differences were observed between these groups. Conclusions: Unlike clinical and demographic variables, process-of-care variables are modifiable and amenable to quality improvement. We observed that rapid antibiotic initiation and appropriate antibiotic selection in the emergency department have a statistically significant association with shorter LOS. These findings suggest quality improvement targeted at these processes of care may improve resource utilization and reduce LOS for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; antibiotic agent; antibiotic therapy; retrospective studies; major clinical study; clinical trial; practice guideline; time factors; pneumonia; drug delivery systems; health care quality; patient care; emergency ward; length of stay; hospitalization; anti-bacterial agents; statistical analysis; clinical protocols; hospital patient; logistic regression analysis; quality of health care; community-acquired infections; health care rationing; humans; human; male; female; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Archives of Internal Medicine
Volume: 162
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0003-9926
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2002-03-25
Start Page: 682
End Page: 688
Language: English
PUBMED: 11911722
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.682
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 14 November 2014 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Howard T Thaler
    245 Thaler