Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib Journal Article


Authors: Rini, B. I.; Cohen, D. P.; Lu, D. R.; Chen, I.; Hariharan, S.; Gore, M. E.; Figlin, R. A.; Baum, M. S.; Motzer, R. J.
Article Title: Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib
Abstract: Background Hypertension (HTN) is an on-target effect of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitor, sunitinib. We evaluated the association of sunitinib-induced HTN with antitumor efficacy and HTN-associated adverse events in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods This retrospective analysis included pooled efficacy (n = 544) and safety (n = 4917) data from four studies of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib 50 mg/d administered on a 4-week-on 2-week-off schedule (schedule 4/2). Blood pressure (BP) was measured in the clinic on days 1 and 28 of each 6-week cycle. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were also estimated by a Cox proportional hazards models using HTN as a time-dependent covariate. Efficacy outcomes were compared between patients with and without HTN (maximum systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg). Adverse events were also compared between patients with and without HTN (mean SBP ≥140 mm Hg or mean DBP ≥90 mm Hg). All P values were two-sided. Results Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and sunitinib-induced HTN defined by maximum SBP had better outcomes than those without treatment-induced HTN (objective response rate: 54.8% vs 8.7%; median PFS: 12.5 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.9 to 13.7 vs 2.5 months, 95% CI = 2.3 to 3.8 months; and OS: 30.9 months, 95% CI = 27.9 to 33.7 vs 7.2 months, 95% CI = 5.6 to 10.7 months; P <. 001 for all). Similar results were obtained when comparing patients with vs without sunitinib-induced HTN defined by maximum DBP. In a Cox proportional hazards model using HTN as a time-dependent covariate, PFS (HR of disease progression or death =. 603, 95% CI =. 451 to. 805; P <. 001) and OS (HR of death =. 332, 95% CI =. 252 to. 436; P <. 001) were improved in patients with treatment-induced HTN defined by maximum SBP; OS (HR of death =. 585, 95% CI =. 463 to. 740; P <. 001) was improved in patients with treatment-induced HTN defined by maximum DBP, but PFS was not. Few any-cause cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, ocular, and renal adverse events were observed. Rates of adverse events were similar between patients with and without HTN defined by mean SBP; however, hypertensive patients had somewhat more renal adverse events (5% vs 3%; P =. 013). Conclusions In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib-associated HTN is associated with improved clinical outcomes without clinically significant increases in HTN-associated adverse events, supporting its viability as an efficacy biomarker. © The Author 2011.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; major clinical study; overall survival; sunitinib; drug efficacy; drug safety; heart left ventricle failure; hypertension; side effect; metastasis; progression free survival; kidney failure; antineoplastic activity; kidney carcinoma; acute kidney failure; heart failure; heart infarction; transient ischemic attack; blood pressure; visual disorder; brain hematoma; congestive heart failure; proteinuria; thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; nephrotic syndrome; blurred vision; visual acuity; posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; visual field defect
Journal Title: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume: 103
Issue: 9
ISSN: 0027-8874
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2011-05-04
Start Page: 763
End Page: 773
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr128
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC3086879
PUBMED: 21527770
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 23 June 2011" - "CODEN: JNCIA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1243 Motzer
  2. Michael S Baum
    20 Baum