Genotype correlations with blood pressure and efficacy from a randomized phase III trial of second-line axitinib versus sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Escudier, B.; Rini, B. I.; Motzer, R. J.; Tarazi, J.; Kim, S.; Huang, X.; Rosbrook, B.; English, P. A.; Loomis, A. K.; Williams, J. A.
Article Title: Genotype correlations with blood pressure and efficacy from a randomized phase III trial of second-line axitinib versus sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Abstract: Clinical outcomes among patients who receive antiangiogenic therapies vary; identification of genetic biomarkers can guide treatment of individual patients. Blood samples from 306 patients in the axitinib second-line (AXIS) trial (NCT00678392) were analyzed for associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and blood pressure and efficacy. VEGFR2 rs2071559 predicted efficacy in patients who received sorafenib, although with insufficient sensitivity or specificity for use in clinical practice. Background: In the phase III axitinib second-line (AXIS) trial, axitinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Analyses of associations between germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and outcomes are reported. Patients and Methods: DNA samples from blood were genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination. Logistic/Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate association of 15 SNPs in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, or hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha with outcomes for blood pressure (BP; Grade >= 3 hypertension, diastolic BP > 90 mm Hg, and increase >= 15 mm Hg from baseline) and efficacy (independent review committee-assessed objective response rate and PFS, and overall survival [OS]). Multivariate analyses assessed SNPs and baseline characteristics as potential predictors of PFS and OS. Results: Genotype data were available for 305 (42.7%) of 714 patients; 159 received axitinib and 146 sorafenib. After Bonferroni adjustment, no SNP was associated with BP outcomes. In axitinib-treated patients, VEGF-A rs699947 (A/A vs. C/C) and rs833061 (C/C vs. T/T) were associated with longer OS (27.0 vs. 13.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; P-adjusted = .015). In sorafenib-treated patients, VEGFR2 rs2071559 (G/G vs. A/A) was associated with longer OS (26.8 vs. 13.8 months; HR, 0.41; P-adjusted = .030). In multivariate analyses, no SNP predicted axitinib efficacy; VEGFR2 rs2071559 predicted PFS (P = .0053) and OS (P = .0027) for sorafenib. Sensitivity/specificity of VEGFR2 rs2071559 for OS was < 80%. Conclusion: No SNP predicted axitinib outcomes. Although VEGFR2 rs2071559 predicted sorafenib efficacy in patients with mRCC, sensitivity/specificity limitations preclude its use for selecting individual patients for sorafenib treatment.
Keywords: angiogenesis; biomarker; vegf; breast-cancer; lung-cancer; endothelial growth-factor; single-nucleotide polymorphism; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; 1st-line sunitinib; interpatient; pharmacogenomic; sunitinib-induced toxicity; advanced thyroid-cancer; pharmacogenetic factors; pathway polymorphisms
Journal Title: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume: 13
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1558-7673
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2015-08-01
Start Page: 328
End Page: 337.e3
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000357880000033
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.02.007
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 25816720
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1246 Motzer